Skip to content

Bug 1989417: bring back oc adm storage-admin test #26408

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2021
Merged

Bug 1989417: bring back oc adm storage-admin test #26408

openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2021

Conversation

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh commented Aug 18, 2021

/assign @deejross

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 18, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 18, 2021

@soltysh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1989417, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhouying7780

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1989417: bring back oc adm storage-admin test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 18, 2021
@rosspeoples
Copy link

rosspeoples commented Aug 18, 2021

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 18, 2021

/hold
to make sure this doesn't conflict with #26366

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 18, 2021
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 19, 2021
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Aug 19, 2021
@rosspeoples
Copy link

rosspeoples commented Aug 19, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2021
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/retest

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Aug 19, 2021

/hold
looks like the problem is still there

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 19, 2021
@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Sep 1, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Sep 1, 2021
@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Sep 1, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@mfojtik
Copy link
Contributor

mfojtik commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
ravisantoshgudimetla
ravisantoshgudimetla approved these changes Sep 1, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 1, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deejross, mfojtik, ravisantoshgudimetla, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 1, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 1, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Sep 1, 2021

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd
that's being worked on
/test e2e-aws-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 1, 2021

@soltysh: Overrode contexts on behalf of soltysh: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd
that's being worked on
/test e2e-aws-serial

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Sep 1, 2021

/test e2e-aws-fips

@soltysh
Copy link
Contributor Author

soltysh commented Sep 1, 2021

/test e2e-aws-single-node
/test e2e-gcp-builds

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

@soltysh: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 5a308dc link /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ravisantoshgudimetla
Copy link
Contributor

ravisantoshgudimetla commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 2, 2021

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a28c0b3 into openshift:master Sep 2, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 2, 2021

@soltysh: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1989417 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1989417: bring back oc adm storage-admin test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@soltysh soltysh deleted the bug1989417 branch September 2, 2021 04:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@zhouying7780 zhouying7780 Awaiting requested review from zhouying7780

@bparees bparees Awaiting requested review from bparees

@smarterclayton smarterclayton Awaiting requested review from smarterclayton

1 more reviewer

@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

@mfojtik mfojtik

@rosspeoples rosspeoples

@ravisantoshgudimetla ravisantoshgudimetla

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@soltysh @rosspeoples @mfojtik @openshift-bot @ravisantoshgudimetla @openshift-merge-robot