Skip to content

Bug 2109546: manifest - Pin systemd version#911

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits intoopenshift:release-4.8from
ravanelli:fix_ci
Jul 27, 2022
Merged

Bug 2109546: manifest - Pin systemd version#911
openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits intoopenshift:release-4.8from
ravanelli:fix_ci

Conversation

@ravanelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

  • The RHCOS CI is failing due an update in systemd,
    let's pin it until we can solve it

More info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109546

- The RHCOS CI is failing due an update in systemd,
let's pin it until we can solve it

More info: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2109546
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 25, 2022

@ravanelli: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

manifest: Pin systemd version

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from dustymabe and miabbott July 25, 2022 15:23
@ravanelli ravanelli closed this Jul 25, 2022
@cgwalters
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

OK but it's worth noting we will also lose out on any future CVE fixes until we get this solved. We will likely have to add a workaround to c-l-h-m. Or worst case, disable c-l-h-m in 8.4-based streams.

/approve

@ravanelli ravanelli reopened this Jul 25, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 25, 2022

@ravanelli: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

manifest: Pin systemd version

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 25, 2022
@ravanelli ravanelli changed the title manifest: Pin systemd version Bug 2109546: manifest - Pin systemd version Jul 25, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 25, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 25, 2022

@ravanelli: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2109546, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "---" instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 2109546 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2109546: manifest - Pin systemd version

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ravanelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 25, 2022

@ravanelli: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2109546, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "---" instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 2109546 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ravanelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 25, 2022

@ravanelli: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2109546, which is invalid:

  • expected Bugzilla bug 2109546 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.9.0, 4.9.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mike-nguyen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 26, 2022

@mike-nguyen: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2109546, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.8.z" release, but it targets "4.8.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@mike-nguyen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 26, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 26, 2022

@mike-nguyen: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2109546, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2111107 is in the state CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2111107 targets the "4.9.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0, 4.9.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mike-nguyen

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from mike-nguyen July 26, 2022 16:25
@travier
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

travier commented Jul 26, 2022

�[36mINFO�[0m[2022-07-25T17:44:57Z] + git submodule update --init --recursive
fatal: detected dubious ownership in repository at '/go/src/github.com/openshift/os'
To add an exception for this directory, call:

	git config --global --add safe.directory /go/src/github.com/openshift/os

This needs a workaround in the Prow config in openshift/release We can do the workaround here.

@travier
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

travier commented Jul 27, 2022

Can you pick the commit from #917 into this PR?

@ravanelli
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

ravanelli commented Jul 27, 2022

Can you pick the commit from #917 into this PR?

Seems it needs to be merged first.

@mike-nguyen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

mike-nguyen commented Jul 27, 2022

The CI in #917 failing on the test that this is suppose to workaround. I think you Timothee is saying to rebase on top of #917

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 27, 2022

@ravanelli: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@mike-nguyen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/lgtm

@mike-nguyen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jul 27, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 27, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 27, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, mike-nguyen, ravanelli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [cgwalters,mike-nguyen]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mike-nguyen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jul 27, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 8d64d10 into openshift:release-4.8 Jul 27, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 27, 2022

@ravanelli: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2109546 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2109546: manifest - Pin systemd version

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants