Skip to content

Comments

chore: Move wasm policy behind the feature flag#197

Merged
gtema merged 1 commit intomainfrom
policy_container
Jul 25, 2025
Merged

chore: Move wasm policy behind the feature flag#197
gtema merged 1 commit intomainfrom
policy_container

Conversation

@gtema
Copy link
Collaborator

@gtema gtema commented Jul 25, 2025

Since wasm is now not the preferred way of policy enforcement hide it
behind the not default feature flag - user must explicitly understand
the consequences.

Since wasm is now not the preferred way of policy enforcement hide it
behind the not default feature flag - user must explicitly understand
the consequences.
@github-actions
Copy link

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchpolicy_container
Testbedubuntu-latest
Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
microseconds (µs)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
microseconds (µs)
(Limit %)
fernet token/project📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
9.93 µs
(+0.66%)Baseline: 9.87 µs
10.24 µs
(97.02%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

@gtema gtema merged commit 7c28c1c into main Jul 25, 2025
18 checks passed
@gtema gtema deleted the policy_container branch September 11, 2025 10:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant