[5.15-velinux] Intel: backport KVM Fix for Clearing SGX EDECCSSA to 5.15#44
Open
zhiquan1-li wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
[5.15-velinux] Intel: backport KVM Fix for Clearing SGX EDECCSSA to 5.15#44zhiquan1-li wants to merge 4 commits into
zhiquan1-li wants to merge 4 commits into
Conversation
commit 5f4d1fd upstream. OpenSSL 3.0 deprecates some of the functions used in the SGX selftests, causing build errors on new distros. For now ignore the warnings until support for the functions is no longer available and mark FIXME so that it can be clear this should be removed at some point. Intel-SIG: commit 5f4d1fd selftests/sgx: Ignore OpenSSL 3.0 deprecated functions warning Backport some SGX bug fixes. Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> [ Zhiquan Li: amend commit log ] Signed-off-by: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
commit ee56a28 upstream. Modify the comments for sgx_encl_lookup_backing() and for sgx_encl_alloc_backing() to indicate that they take a reference which must be dropped with a call to sgx_encl_put_backing(). Make sgx_encl_lookup_backing() static for now, and change the name of sgx_encl_get_backing() to __sgx_encl_get_backing() to make it more clear that sgx_encl_get_backing() is an internal function. Intel-SIG: commit ee56a28 x86/sgx: Improve comments for sgx_encl_lookup/alloc_backing() Backport some SGX bug fixes. Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YtUs3MKLzFg+rqEV@zn.tnic/ [ Zhiquan Li: amend commit log ] Signed-off-by: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
commit 370839c upstream. Short Version: Allow enclaves to use the new Asynchronous EXit (AEX) notification mechanism. This mechanism lets enclaves run a handler after an AEX event. These handlers can run mitigations for things like SGX-Step[1]. AEX Notify will be made available both on upcoming processors and on some older processors through microcode updates. Long Version: == SGX Attribute Background == The SGX architecture includes a list of SGX "attributes". These attributes ensure consistency and transparency around specific enclave features. As a simple example, the "DEBUG" attribute allows an enclave to be debugged, but also destroys virtually all of SGX security. Using attributes, enclaves can know that they are being debugged. Attributes also affect enclave attestation so an enclave can, for instance, be denied access to secrets while it is being debugged. The kernel keeps a list of known attributes and will only initialize enclaves that use a known set of attributes. This kernel policy eliminates the chance that a new SGX attribute could cause undesired effects. For example, imagine a new attribute was added called "PROVISIONKEY2" that provided similar functionality to "PROVISIIONKEY". A kernel policy that allowed indiscriminate use of unknown attributes and thus PROVISIONKEY2 would undermine the existing kernel policy which limits use of PROVISIONKEY enclaves. == AEX Notify Background == "Intel Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features - Version 45" is out[2]. There is a new chapter: Asynchronous Enclave Exit Notify and the EDECCSSA User Leaf Function. Enclaves exit can be either synchronous and consensual (EEXIT for instance) or asynchronous (on an interrupt or fault). The asynchronous ones can evidently be exploited to single step enclaves[1], on top of which other naughty things can be built. AEX Notify will be made available both on upcoming processors and on some older processors through microcode updates. == The Problem == These attacks are currently entirely opaque to the enclave since the hardware does the save/restore under the covers. The Asynchronous Enclave Exit Notify (AEX Notify) mechanism provides enclaves an ability to detect and mitigate potential exposure to these kinds of attacks. == The Solution == Define the new attribute value for AEX Notification. Ensure the attribute is cleared from the list reserved attributes. Instead of adding to the open-coded lists of individual attributes, add named lists of privileged (disallowed by default) and unprivileged (allowed by default) attributes. Add the AEX notify attribute as an unprivileged attribute, which will keep the kernel from rejecting enclaves with it set. 1. https://github.com/jovanbulck/sgx-step 2. https://cdrdv2.intel.com/v1/dl/getContent/671368?explicitVersion=true Intel-SIG: commit 370839c x86/sgx: Allow enclaves to use Asynchrounous Exit Notification Backport some SGX bug fixes. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> Tested-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@intel.com> Tested-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220720191347.1343986-1-dave.hansen%40linux.intel.com [ Zhiquan Li: amend commit log ] Signed-off-by: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
commit 16a7fe3 upstream. The new Asynchronous Exit (AEX) notification mechanism (AEX-notify) allows one enclave to receive a notification in the ERESUME after the enclave exit due to an AEX. EDECCSSA is a new SGX user leaf function (ENCLU[EDECCSSA]) to facilitate the AEX notification handling. The new EDECCSSA is enumerated via CPUID(EAX=0x12,ECX=0x0):EAX[11]. Besides Allowing reporting the new AEX-notify attribute to KVM guests, also allow reporting the new EDECCSSA user leaf function to KVM guests so the guest can fully utilize the AEX-notify mechanism. Similar to existing X86_FEATURE_SGX1 and X86_FEATURE_SGX2, introduce a new scattered X86_FEATURE_SGX_EDECCSSA bit for the new EDECCSSA, and report it in KVM's supported CPUIDs. Note, no additional KVM enabling is required to allow the guest to use EDECCSSA. It's impossible to trap ENCLU (without completely preventing the guest from using SGX). Advertise EDECCSSA as supported purely so that userspace doesn't need to special case EDECCSSA, i.e. doesn't need to manually check host CPUID. The inability to trap ENCLU also means that KVM can't prevent the guest from using EDECCSSA, but that virtualization hole is benign as far as KVM is concerned. EDECCSSA is simply a fancy way to modify internal enclave state. More background about how do AEX-notify and EDECCSSA work: SGX maintains a Current State Save Area Frame (CSSA) for each enclave thread. When AEX happens, the enclave thread context is saved to the CSSA and the CSSA is increased by 1. For a normal ERESUME which doesn't deliver AEX notification, it restores the saved thread context from the previously saved SSA and decreases the CSSA. If AEX-notify is enabled for one enclave, the ERESUME acts differently. Instead of restoring the saved thread context and decreasing the CSSA, it acts like EENTER which doesn't decrease the CSSA but establishes a clean slate thread context using the CSSA for the enclave to handle the notification. After some handling, the enclave must discard the "new-established" SSA and switch back to the previously saved SSA (upon AEX). Otherwise, the enclave will run out of SSA space upon further AEXs and eventually fail to run. To solve this problem, the new EDECCSSA essentially decreases the CSSA. It can be used by the enclave notification handler to switch back to the previous saved SSA when needed, i.e. after it handles the notification. Intel-SIG: commit 16a7fe3 KVM/VMX: Allow exposing EDECCSSA user leaf function to KVM guest Backport some SGX bug fixes. Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221101022422.858944-1-kai.huang%40intel.com [ Zhiquan Li: amend commit log ] Signed-off-by: Zhiquan Li <zhiquan1.li@intel.com>
guojinhui-liam
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 3, 2026
commit 5d92c7c upstream. If the ata_port_alloc() call in ata_host_alloc() fails, ata_host_release() will get called. However, the code in ata_host_release() tries to free ata_port struct members unconditionally, which can lead to the following: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000003990 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 10 PID: 594 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.10.0-rc5 #44 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] Code: e4 4d 63 f4 44 89 e2 48 c7 c6 90 ad 32 c0 48 c7 c7 d0 70 33 c0 49 83 c6 0e 41 RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ebb968 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: ffff88810fb52e78 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff88813b3218c0 RDI: ffff88813b3218c0 RBP: ffff88810fb52e40 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 6c65725f74736f68 R10: ffffc90000ebb738 R11: 73692033203a746e R12: 0000000000000004 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000011 R15: 0000000000000006 FS: 00007f6cc55b9980(0000) GS:ffff88813b300000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000003990 CR3: 00000001122a2000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x2f0 ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] ? ata_host_release.cold+0x2f/0x6e [libata] release_nodes+0x35/0xb0 devres_release_group+0x113/0x140 ata_host_alloc+0xed/0x120 [libata] ata_host_alloc_pinfo+0x14/0xa0 [libata] ahci_init_one+0x6c9/0xd20 [ahci] Do not access ata_port struct members unconditionally. Fixes: 633273a ("libata-pmp: hook PMP support and enable it") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240629124210.181537-7-cassel@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Diangang Li <lidiangang@bytedance.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR includes incremental backporting patches which mainly covers some SGX bug fixes which are missing in VeLinux.
About the patches
The total patch number is 4:
Tests
Step 1. Original SGX EDECCSSA status in guest
Step 2. Disable SGX in guest
Step 3. The SGX EDECCSSA capability is cleared in KVM, then its status becomes
falseKnown issue:
None
Default config change:
None