Should we continue to remove the `olm.bundle.object` bundle property for the HTTP server?

[everettraven]

Creating this issue to continue discussion of https://github.com/operator-framework/catalogd/pull/144/files#r1304851060

[joelanford]

We should leave the olm.bundle.object properties in the blobs that we serve from the catalogd HTTP server. IMO, we should not merge #144 until it stores the blobs untouched.

Reasoning (that I also commented in the PR): I don't think disk space is a concern. All of the CPU used for deserialization/reserialization to filter that property out is more of a concern.

[anik120]

This has been removed.