Skip to content

Crubin/forced bucketing #70

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
caitlinrubin-optimizely merged 3 commits into from
Aug 17, 2017
Merged

Crubin/forced bucketing #70

caitlinrubin-optimizely merged 3 commits into from
Aug 17, 2017

Conversation

@caitlinrubin-optimizely
Copy link
Contributor

@caitlinrubin-optimizely caitlinrubin-optimizely commented Aug 17, 2017

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 17, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.5%) to 96.667% when pulling 0c26b7c on crubin/forced-bucketing into 90a3f59 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 17, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+1.5%) to 96.667% when pulling 0c26b7c on crubin/forced-bucketing into 90a3f59 on master.

mikeproeng37
mikeproeng37 approved these changes Aug 17, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@caitlinrubin-optimizely caitlinrubin-optimizely merged commit 982e3a5 into master Aug 17, 2017
@caitlinrubin-optimizely caitlinrubin-optimizely deleted the crubin/forced-bucketing branch August 17, 2017 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@caitlinrubin-optimizely @coveralls @mikeproeng37