Skip to content

add USAGE_EXPLORE.md#103

Merged
p14c31355 merged 5 commits intofeature/#101from
docs/README-EXPLORE
Aug 28, 2025
Merged

add USAGE_EXPLORE.md#103
p14c31355 merged 5 commits intofeature/#101from
docs/README-EXPLORE

Conversation

@p14c31355
Copy link
Owner

🚀 Pull Request

Overview

Change details

  • New feature
  • Refactoring
  • Bug fix
  • CI / Build settings correction
  • Documentation update

@p14c31355 p14c31355 self-assigned this Aug 28, 2025
@p14c31355 p14c31355 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @p14c31355, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the project's documentation by extracting verbose Rustdoc comments from the src/explorer.rs and src/scanner.rs files into a new, dedicated markdown file, docs/USAGE_EXPLORE.md. The primary goal is to enhance the readability of the core Rust code by separating detailed explanations and usage examples into a more accessible and organized documentation format. This change improves the maintainability of both the code and its accompanying documentation.

Highlights

  • New Documentation File: A new dedicated Markdown file, docs/USAGE_EXPLORE.md, has been introduced to house all detailed documentation, examples, and explanations for the I2C Command Sequence Explorer module.
  • Rustdoc Refactoring: Extensive Rustdoc comments, including module-level explanations, examples, and method descriptions, have been extracted from src/explorer.rs and src/scanner.rs and moved into the new USAGE_EXPLORE.md file.
  • Improved Code Readability: This refactoring significantly cleans up the Rust source files, making the code itself easier to read and navigate by separating the implementation details from the comprehensive usage documentation.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the documentation by moving detailed explanations from Rustdoc comments in src/explorer.rs and src/scanner.rs into a new docs/USAGE_EXPLORE.md file. This is a good step towards separating usage documentation from inline code comments. My review focuses on improving the formatting and readability of the new Markdown file to make it more effective as standalone documentation, and points out some minor code style issues in the source files.

/// This function first performs cycle detection using a modified Kahn's algorithm.
/// If a cycle is detected, it returns an `ExplorerError::DependencyCycle`.
/// Otherwise, it initializes and returns a `PermutationIter` to generate all valid permutations.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This blank line was left after removing the documentation comment. To maintain a clean and consistent coding style, it should be removed. Similar extra blank lines are present on lines 179 and 265.

p14c31355 and others added 4 commits August 29, 2025 01:33
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@p14c31355 p14c31355 merged commit 752e44d into feature/#101 Aug 28, 2025
@p14c31355 p14c31355 deleted the docs/README-EXPLORE branch August 29, 2025 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments