Skip to content

chore(deps): bump ndarray from 0.16.1 to 0.17.2#12

Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dependabot/cargo/ndarray-0.17.2
Open

chore(deps): bump ndarray from 0.16.1 to 0.17.2#12
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
dependabot/cargo/ndarray-0.17.2

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 30, 2026

Bumps ndarray from 0.16.1 to 0.17.2.

Changelog

Sourced from ndarray's changelog.

Version 0.17.2 (2026-01-10)

Version 0.17.2 is mainly a patch fix to bugs related to the new ArrayRef implementation.

In addition, ndarray has reduced its packaging footprint to ease supply chain reviews (and shrink the binary size!). A special thanks to @​SwishSwushPow and @​weiznich for bringing this to our attention and making the necessary changes.

Added

Fixed

Documentation

Version 0.17.1 (2025-11-02)

Version 0.17.1 provides a patch to fix the originally-unsound implementation of the new array reference types.

The reference types are now all unsized. Practically speaking, this has one major implication: writing functions and traits that accept RawRef and LayoutRef will now need a + ?Sized bound to work ergonomically with ArrayRef. For example, the release notes for 0.17.0 said

Reading / Writing Shape: LayoutRef<A, D>

LayoutRef lets functions view or modify shape/stride information without touching data. This replaces verbose signatures like:

fn alter_view<S>(a: &mut ArrayBase<S, Ix1>)
where S: Data<Elem = f64>;

Use AsRef / AsMut for best compatibility:

fn alter_shape<T>(a: &mut T)
where T: AsMut<LayoutRef<f64>>;

However, these functions now need an additional bound to allow for callers to pass in &ArrayRef types:

fn alter_shape<T>(a: &mut T)
where T: AsMut<LayoutRef<f64>> + ?Sized; // Added bound here

A huge thank you to Sarah Quiñones (@​sarah-quinones) for catching the original unsound bug and helping to fix it. She does truly excellent work with faer-rs; check it out!

Version 0.17.0 (2025-10-14) [YANKED]

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [ndarray](https://github.com/rust-ndarray/ndarray) from 0.16.1 to 0.17.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/rust-ndarray/ndarray/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/rust-ndarray/ndarray/blob/master/RELEASES.md)
- [Commits](rust-ndarray/ndarray@0.16.1...0.17.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: ndarray
  dependency-version: 0.17.2
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Mar 30, 2026

Labels

The following labels could not be found: dependencies. Please create it before Dependabot can add it to a pull request.

Please fix the above issues or remove invalid values from dependabot.yml.

@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from pablontiv as a code owner March 30, 2026 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants