DEP: Bump min version of dateutil to 2.7.3

[ShaharNaveh]

• xref TST: Fixed xfail for tests in pandas/tests/tseries/offsets/test_offsets_properties.py #32465 (comment)
• tests added / passed
• passes black pandas
• passes git diff upstream/master -u -- "*.py" | flake8 --diff
• whatsnew entry

---

Not sure where to put the note in the "whatsnew"

[datapythonista]

lgtm, thanks @MomIsBestFriend

Can you have a look at the CI and see what's wrong please?

[TomAugspurger]

In 1.0, we had dependency bumps under the "Backwards incompatible" section. https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/whatsnew/v1.0.0.html#increased-minimum-versions-for-dependencies. We can do that again, or make a new top-level section.

[simonjayhawkins]

In 1.0, we had dependency bumps under the "Backwards incompatible" section.

so, by definition, this is an breaking change? is this necessary or can it keep till 2.0?

[ShaharNaveh]

In 1.0, we had dependency bumps under the "Backwards incompatible" section.

so, by definition, this is an breaking change? is this necessary or can it keep till 2.0?

Haven't thought of that.

---

I'll push more commits when someone from the pandas-core team will tell me if this PR is relevant :)

[TomAugspurger]

I wouldn't consider this an API breaking change. That's just the header it went under in older versions.

[ShaharNaveh]

Can you have a look at the CI and see what's wrong please?

@datapythonista I have found out that there is a bug in 2.7.0 that was fixed in 2.7.3 when parsing a NaN (ref dateutil/dateutil#662)

[WillAyd]

lgtm

[jreback]

thanks @MomIsBestFriend

as a followon can you see if we can change code for anything that needed < 2.7.3 (i don't know if there is anything, but its possible).