Conversation
Co-authored-by: Max Wase <max.vvase@gmail.com>
|
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
I am working on this. |
|
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
I am working on this. This is a very important issue. |
|
@kpp can you give us an update? I agree this is important specially considering the issues with networking/parachains at the moment |
|
So we got 2 working implementations: libp2p/rust-libp2p#2289 and libp2p/rust-libp2p#2801. Both of them are compatible with the go implementation but none of them are merged. |
|
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
I am working on this issue |
| .timeout(Duration::from_secs(20)) | ||
| .timeout(Duration::from_secs(20)); | ||
|
|
||
| let quic_transport = if enable_quic { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
IMO the either way is OK.
|
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Co-authored-by: Anton <anton.kalyaev@gmail.com>
|
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
:( |
|
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
Hey, is anyone still working on this? Due to the inactivity this issue has been automatically marked as stale. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
This is a follow-up of #6366
From the point of view of Substrate:
--experimental-quicCLI option is set to true (with default value = false).quic-v1not onquic, otherwise the listening will fail.Before we can consider merging, we need to:
quinn-protolibp2p/rust-libp2p#2289.So far I managed to connect two nodes through QUIC:
cargo r --bin node-template -- --no-mdns --experimental-quic --listen-addr /ip6/::1/tcp/8081 /ip6/::1/udp/8081/quic-v1 --alice --tmpcargo r --bin node-template -- --no-mdns --experimental-quic --listen-addr /ip4/0.0.0.0/udp/8080/quic-v1 --bootnodes /ip6/::1/udp/8081/quic-v1/p2p/12D3KooWRRNUr42JBC79TuiWSg3BnAcsNwjT6zasJsCrcB5bgaxK --bob --tmp