Skip to content

Bump payjoin-cli 0.1.0#461

Closed
DanGould wants to merge 1 commit intopayjoin:masterfrom
DanGould:bump-payjoin-cli-0-1-0
Closed

Bump payjoin-cli 0.1.0#461
DanGould wants to merge 1 commit intopayjoin:masterfrom
DanGould:bump-payjoin-cli-0-1-0

Conversation

@DanGould
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@DanGould DanGould commented Jan 3, 2025

Summary:

Take the payjoin-cli out of alpha now that the wire protocol is presumed to be stable.

Changelog:


Because we've already made changes to the payjoin crate, this'll have to be released on a branch which I've pushed to https://github.com/payjoin/rust-payjoin/tree/payjoin-cli-0.1.0. But we still need this bump to Cargo.toml and Changelog. Note that this is going to have a different Cargo.lock by necessity on master than it will in the tagged branch.

Summary:

Take the payjoin-cli out of alpha now that the wire protocol is presumed
to be stable.

Changelog:

- Bump payjoin to v0.22.0 with stable wire protocol
  - Allow mixed input scripts in v2 (payjoin#367)

- Fix bug to propagate missing  config parameter or argument error (payjoin#441)
- Don't pause between long polling requests (payjoin#463)
- Hide danger-local-https feature with _ prefix (payjoin#423)
@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12605379636

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.04%) to 61.742%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12600684475: 0.04%
Covered Lines: 2942
Relevant Lines: 4765

💛 - Coveralls

@DanGould
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

DanGould commented Jan 4, 2025

Closed because of the complexity of releasing on a mutated 0.22.0 api on master and limited demand. If someone asks I will cut a release.

@DanGould DanGould closed this Jan 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants