2-nd lost-waffle's argument's adding feature

[art-kan]

What kind of change is this? (Bug Fix, Feature...)
Feature.

What is the current behavior (You can also link to an issue)
Yes.

What is the new behavior this introduces (if any)
lost-waffle: 1/3 3/1;
Where 3/1 is cycle/start

Does this introduce any breaking changes?
Likely no.

Does the PR fulfill these requirements?

• [Y] Tests for the changes have been added
• Docs have been added or updated

Other Comments

<!-- HTML -->
<section>
    <div>Item 1</div>
    <div>Item 2</div>
    <div>Item 3</div>
    <div>Item 4</div>
    <div>Item 5</div>
</section>

/* CSS (before) */
div {
	lost-waffle: 1/3 3/2;
}

div:first-child {
	lost-offset: 1/3;
}

/* CSS (after) */
div {
	width: calc(100% * 1/3 - (10px - 10px * 1/3));
	max-width: calc(100% * 1/3 - (10px - 10px * 1/3));
	height: calc(100% * 1/3 - (10px - 10px * 1/3));
}

div:nth-child(1n) {
	float: left;
	margin-right: 10px;
	margin-bottom: 10px;
	clear: none;
}

div:last-child {
	margin-right: 0;
	margin-bottom: 0;
}

div:nth-child(3n + 2) {
	margin-right: 0;
}

div:nth-child(3n) {
	clear: both;
}

div:nth-last-child(-n + 3) {
	margin-bottom: 0;
}

div:first-child {
	margin-left: calc(100% * (-1/3 * -1) - (10px - 10px * (-1/3 * -1)) + 10px) !important;
}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #423 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #423   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files          19     19           
  Lines         701    712   +11     
=====================================
+ Hits          701    712   +11

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/lost-waffle.js	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9be2233...046094c. Read the comment docs.

[peterramsing]

I'm sorry this has taken me so long to get back to. Thanks so much for taking the time to write this. Let me wrap my head around this and play with what you've got here. This could be something pretty swell.

If you don't mind I'm going to create an issue for this so we can line the code up with an issue. Let's talk about the feature there and the code here, eh?

Thanks again!

[peterramsing]

Closing for now but poke if you want to circle back on this.