Skip to content

feat: add CODEOWNERS file for code owner review enforcement#78

Merged
don-petry merged 1 commit intomainfrom
claude/issue-50-20260406-1842
Apr 6, 2026
Merged

feat: add CODEOWNERS file for code owner review enforcement#78
don-petry merged 1 commit intomainfrom
claude/issue-50-20260406-1842

Conversation

@don-petry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Adds .github/CODEOWNERS assigning @don-petry as default owner for all files
  • Satisfies the pr-quality ruleset's "Require code owner review" setting, which has no effect without a CODEOWNERS file
  • Resolves the compliance finding from the weekly audit

Test plan

  • Verify compliance audit no longer flags missing-codeowners after merge
  • Verify @don-petry is listed as required reviewer on new PRs

Closes #50

Generated with Claude Code

Adds .github/CODEOWNERS assigning @don-petry as default owner for all files.
Satisfies the pr-quality ruleset requirement for code owner reviews (the
"Require code owner review" setting has no effect without a CODEOWNERS file).

Closes #50

Co-authored-by: don-petry <don-petry@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 6, 2026 18:43
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

@don-petry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

All CI checks are passing. @don-petry — please review and merge this PR to resolve the CODEOWNERS compliance finding (issue #50).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Adds a repository-wide CODEOWNERS definition so the existing pr-quality ruleset’s “Require code owner review” setting can actually enforce ownership-based approvals and clear the missing-codeowners compliance finding.

Changes:

  • Introduces .github/CODEOWNERS with a catch-all rule assigning @don-petry as the default owner for all paths.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 6, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@don-petry has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 14 minutes and 46 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9de1b82a-e935-4e34-bbab-a8a6db1053c4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d51eb8 and 265f6dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch claude/issue-50-20260406-1842

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@don-petry don-petry merged commit ccdb280 into main Apr 6, 2026
22 checks passed
@don-petry don-petry deleted the claude/issue-50-20260406-1842 branch April 6, 2026 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Compliance: missing-codeowners

2 participants