chore(workflows): adopt centralized stubs from petry-projects/.github

[don-petry]

Summary

Replaces inline copies of standardized workflows with the canonical thin caller stubs from petry-projects/.github/standards/workflows/. Each stub delegates to the org-level reusable workflow at petry-projects/.github/.github/workflows/<name>-reusable.yml@v1.

Why

Future updates to the standard propagate automatically without per-repo PRs, and drift is caught by the org-wide compliance audit (petry-projects/.github#89).

See petry-projects/.github#87 (build reusables), petry-projects/.github#88 (pin to v1, document tier model), petry-projects/.github#89 (audit drift detection).

Test plan

• actionlint clean
• CI on this branch — workflows should run via the reusables exactly as before

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@don-petry has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 13 minutes and 38 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 13 minutes and 38 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f2ba529f-b32d-44b0-9f8a-81290df91809

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1620841 and cd1c3e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• .github/workflows/agent-shield.yml
• .github/workflows/claude.yml
• .github/workflows/dependabot-automerge.yml
• .github/workflows/dependabot-rebase.yml
• .github/workflows/feature-ideation.yml

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/adopt-centralized-workflow-stubs

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
7 Security Hotspots

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR replaces several in-repo GitHub Actions workflow implementations with standardized “thin caller stubs” that delegate execution to org-level reusable workflows in petry-projects/.github pinned at @v1, reducing drift and centralizing maintenance.

Changes:

• Swap local workflow logic for calls to org reusable workflows (uses: petry-projects/.github/.github/workflows/*-reusable.yml@v1).
• Add standardized “SOURCE OF TRUTH / AGENTS” headers to document ownership and allowed customization points.
• Align workflow triggers/permissions with the centralized stubs (as defined by the org standards).

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 5 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
.github/workflows/feature-ideation.yml	Convert to thin stub calling feature-ideation-reusable@v1; adds standardized header and updates inputs/context block.
.github/workflows/dependabot-rebase.yml	Replace inline rebase/merge logic with reusable dependabot-rebase-reusable@v1.
.github/workflows/dependabot-automerge.yml	Replace inline automerge logic with reusable dependabot-automerge-reusable@v1.
.github/workflows/claude.yml	Switch to reusable claude-code-reusable@v1 and add standardized header.
.github/workflows/agent-shield.yml	Replace existing caller config with standardized stub for agent-shield-reusable@v1.

[Copilot]

project_context is currently a placeholder TODO. In this repo it was previously populated with a concrete description; leaving the TODO will make the ideation output generic/unhelpful and defeats the purpose of the workflow. Please replace it with a real 3–5 sentence description of this project (you can reuse the prior text if still accurate).

Suggested change

	TODO: Replace this with a description of the project and its market.
	Example: "ProjectX is a [type of product] for [target user]. Competitors
	include A, B, C. Key emerging trends in this space: X, Y, Z."
	This repository contains a GitHub-integrated software project that emphasizes structured delivery workflows, reusable automation, and BMAD Method-aligned collaboration. Its primary users are maintainers and contributors who need reliable CI/CD automation, consistent engineering standards, and actionable product ideation grounded in real repository signals. Mary should research adjacent developer tooling, workflow automation platforms, and repository management solutions such as GitHub-native automation, CI orchestration tools, and AI-assisted planning products to identify opportunities for differentiation in usability, maintainability, and team productivity.