Conversation
The org now uses GitHub-managed CodeQL default setup. Per-repo workflow files are drift and run duplicate analysis alongside the managed default setup. Closes #93 Co-authored-by: don-petry <don-petry@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 59 minutes and 50 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Removes the repository-local CodeQL GitHub Actions workflow to align with the org standard of using GitHub-managed CodeQL default setup (avoiding duplicate CodeQL runs and compliance drift).
Changes:
- Delete
.github/workflows/codeql.yml(legacy CodeQL workflow).
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Automated review — APPROVEDRisk: MEDIUM SummaryPR removes a per-repo CodeQL workflow that a weekly compliance audit flagged as drift; the org now uses GitHub-managed CodeQL default setup which continues to run successfully (evidenced by the passing CodeQL check in the status rollup). All CI checks pass, the change is a pure deletion with no logic changes, and the PR clearly addresses the linked compliance issue #93. FindingsInfo
CI statusAll CI checks pass. CodeQL continues to run via GitHub-managed default setup. Reviewed by the don-petry PR-review cascade (triage: haiku 4.5 → deep: sonnet 4.6 + duck: gpt-5.4 → audit: opus 4.6). Reply with |
|
Auto-rebase failed — merge conflict — this branch has conflicts with Please resolve the conflicts and push: |



Summary
.github/workflows/codeql.ymlwhich was identified as drift by the weekly compliance auditStandard Reference
standards/ci-standards.md#2-codeql-analysis-github-managed-default-setup
Closes #93
Generated with Claude Code