Skip to content

Conversation

@rela589n
Copy link
Contributor

@rela589n rela589n commented Apr 7, 2025

No description provided.

@rela589n rela589n force-pushed the feat-validation-failed-exception-formatter branch from 4007e0e to 2c7c246 Compare April 7, 2025 14:19
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.16%. Comparing base (aa25434) to head (aa065bb).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main      #34      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     96.09%   96.16%   +0.07%     
- Complexity      178      181       +3     
============================================
  Files            43       45       +2     
  Lines           486      495       +9     
============================================
+ Hits            467      476       +9     
  Misses           19       19              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@rela589n rela589n force-pushed the feat-validation-failed-exception-formatter branch from 2c7c246 to aa065bb Compare April 7, 2025 14:21
@rela589n rela589n merged commit b0d690d into main Apr 7, 2025
18 checks passed
@rela589n rela589n deleted the feat-validation-failed-exception-formatter branch April 8, 2025 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants