Conversation
WalkthroughA new Redux Toolkit Query API slice for profile recording was implemented, featuring a mutation endpoint to send wallet mapping data to an ingest endpoint. This mutation is now triggered in the main app component whenever wallet information changes, utilizing wallet data from a third-party authentication hook. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant App
participant PrivyAuth
participant profileApi
participant PillarXAPI
App->>PrivyAuth: useWallets() returns privyWallets
App->>profileApi: useRecordProfileMutation()
App->>profileApi: recordProfile({ owner, account })
profileApi->>PillarXAPI: POST /ingest { owner, account }
PillarXAPI-->>profileApi: Response
Poem
Tip ⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster. ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying x with
|
| Latest commit: |
0d0409f
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://5ae3edc4.x-e62.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://improvement-pro-3311-eoa-add.x-e62.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/apps/pillarx-app/api/homeFeed.ts (1)
70-87: Consider adding TypeScript interfaces for the payload and responseThe
recordProfilemutation doesn't specify TypeScript interfaces for its payload or response. While this might be acceptable for "fire and forget" requests, adding type definitions would improve type safety and documentation.Consider adding type definitions like this:
export interface RecordProfilePayload { owner: string; account: string; } export interface RecordProfileResponse { success: boolean; // Add any other fields returned by the API } export const profileApi = createApi({ reducerPath: 'profileApi', baseQuery: profileBaseQuery, endpoints: (builder) => ({ - recordProfile: builder.mutation({ + recordProfile: builder.mutation<RecordProfileResponse, RecordProfilePayload>({ query: (payload = {}) => { return { url: 'ingest', method: 'POST', body: payload, }; }, }), }), });src/apps/pillarx-app/index.tsx (1)
105-109: Simplify comments for better readabilityThe comments on lines 105-109 are somewhat redundant and restate what the code is already doing. Consider simplifying the comments to provide higher-level context rather than restating the code logic.
- // Did we have a truthy wallet address and truthy privyWallets? if (walletAddress && privyWallets) { - // If we have a privyWallets array, we want to record the profile if (privyWallets.length > 0) { - // We want to record the profile with the first wallet in the array
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/apps/pillarx-app/api/homeFeed.ts(2 hunks)src/apps/pillarx-app/index.tsx(5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: unit-tests
- GitHub Check: lint
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/apps/pillarx-app/api/homeFeed.ts (3)
48-57: Good implementation of the profile base queryThe implementation follows the same pattern as the existing
staggeredBaseQuery, which maintains consistency in the codebase. The retry logic with 5 max retries is appropriate for API resilience.
94-94: LGTM!Correctly adds the profileApi middleware to the store.
98-98: LGTM!Properly exports the hook for use in other components.
src/apps/pillarx-app/index.tsx (5)
4-4: LGTM!Correctly imports the
useWalletshook from Privy's authentication library.
16-20: LGTM!Properly imports the new
useRecordProfileMutationhook along with existing hooks.
51-51: LGTM!Correctly destructures the
walletsarray from the Privy authentication hook.
64-70: LGTM!Good documentation explaining the purpose of the mutation hook.
110-113:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify API payload structure
Ensure that the API endpoint expects the payload in this exact format, with
ownerbeing the smart wallet address andaccountbeing the EOA address. It might be helpful to add a comment explaining what these fields represent.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Let's search for any other uses of this API to confirm the expected payload structure rg -A 3 "recordProfile" --glob "*.{ts,tsx}"Length of output: 1323
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash rg -n -A10 "recordProfile: builder.mutation" src/apps/pillarx-app/api/homeFeed.tsLength of output: 318
Verify
recordProfilepayload shapeWe’ve confirmed that the
recordProfileRTK Query mutation simply POSTs the passedpayloadto"/ingest"and there are no other usages to compare against. Please:
- Confirm that the backend ingest endpoint expects exactly
{ owner: string, account: string }, where
•owneris the Pillar Smart Wallet address
•accountis the user’s EOA address- Add an inline comment at the call site clarifying each field’s meaning, for example:
// Notify backend of EOA→Smart Wallet mapping: // owner: Smart Wallet address; account: EOA address recordProfile({ owner: privyWallets[0]?.address, account: walletAddress, });
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| // This is a "fire and forget" call to the profile API | ||
|
|
||
| // Did we have a truthy wallet address and truthy privyWallets? | ||
| if (walletAddress && privyWallets) { | ||
| // If we have a privyWallets array, we want to record the profile | ||
| if (privyWallets.length > 0) { | ||
| // We want to record the profile with the first wallet in the array | ||
| recordProfile({ | ||
| owner: privyWallets[0]?.address, | ||
| account: walletAddress, | ||
| }); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, [walletAddress, privyWallets, recordProfile]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add additional null/undefined check for wallet address
While the code checks if privyWallets exists and has items, it doesn't explicitly verify that privyWallets[0]?.address is defined before using it in the API call. This could potentially lead to issues if a wallet object exists but doesn't have a valid address property.
Also, consider adding some error handling for the API call:
useEffect(() => {
// This is a "fire and forget" call to the profile API
// Did we have a truthy wallet address and truthy privyWallets?
if (walletAddress && privyWallets) {
// If we have a privyWallets array, we want to record the profile
if (privyWallets.length > 0) {
+ const ownerAddress = privyWallets[0]?.address;
+ if (!ownerAddress) {
+ console.warn('Owner address is undefined, skipping profile recording');
+ return;
+ }
// We want to record the profile with the first wallet in the array
- recordProfile({
- owner: privyWallets[0]?.address,
- account: walletAddress,
- });
+ recordProfile({
+ owner: ownerAddress,
+ account: walletAddress,
+ }).catch(error => {
+ console.error('Failed to record profile:', error);
+ });
}
}
}, [walletAddress, privyWallets, recordProfile]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| useEffect(() => { | |
| // This is a "fire and forget" call to the profile API | |
| // Did we have a truthy wallet address and truthy privyWallets? | |
| if (walletAddress && privyWallets) { | |
| // If we have a privyWallets array, we want to record the profile | |
| if (privyWallets.length > 0) { | |
| // We want to record the profile with the first wallet in the array | |
| recordProfile({ | |
| owner: privyWallets[0]?.address, | |
| account: walletAddress, | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, [walletAddress, privyWallets, recordProfile]); | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| // This is a "fire and forget" call to the profile API | |
| // Did we have a truthy wallet address and truthy privyWallets? | |
| if (walletAddress && privyWallets) { | |
| // If we have a privyWallets array, we want to record the profile | |
| if (privyWallets.length > 0) { | |
| const ownerAddress = privyWallets[0]?.address; | |
| if (!ownerAddress) { | |
| console.warn('Owner address is undefined, skipping profile recording'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| // We want to record the profile with the first wallet in the array | |
| recordProfile({ | |
| owner: ownerAddress, | |
| account: walletAddress, | |
| }).catch(error => { | |
| console.error('Failed to record profile:', error); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, [walletAddress, privyWallets, recordProfile]); |
2 participants
Description
How Has This Been Tested?
Types of changes
Summary by CodeRabbit