remove useless variable.#6703
Conversation
|
/cc @windtalker |
|
/cc @tisonkun |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@LittleFall could you refer to the issue in description or comment where we drop bcj for MPP?
|
@windtalker: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
yeah, according to https://github.com/pingcap/tidb/blob/v5.0.0/planner/core/exhaust_physical_plans.go#L1662-L1679, when mpp is allowed, we will never use old BCJ. |
|
@tisonkun: Thanks for your review. The bot only counts approvals from reviewers and higher roles in list, but you're still welcome to leave your comments. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the ti-community-infra/tichi repository. |
|
[REVIEW NOTIFICATION] This pull request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsReviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review. |
|
/merge |
|
This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge. DetailsCommit hash: 3109825 |
|
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #6707. |
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
This variable is deprecated and useless when mpp is enabled, but may confuse users, so I remove it.
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?