Skip to content

faq: fix the sysbench link #1963

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
yikeke merged 1 commit into from
Mar 6, 2020
Merged

faq: fix the sysbench link #1963

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion faq/tidb.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -730,7 +730,7 @@ No. TiDB (or data created from the transactional API) relies on a specific key f
At the beginning, many users tend to do a benchmark test or a comparison test between TiDB and MySQL. We have also done a similar official test and find the test result is consistent at large, although the test data has some bias. Because the architecture of TiDB differs greatly from MySQL, it is hard to find a benchmark point. The suggestions are as follows:

- Do not spend too much time on the benchmark test. Pay more attention to the difference of scenarios using TiDB.
- See [Performance test result for TiDB using Sysbench](https://github.com/pingcap/docs/blob/master/dev/benchmark/sysbench-v4.md).
- See [Performance test result for TiDB using Sysbench](/benchmark/sysbench-v4.md).

#### What's the relationship between the TiDB cluster capacity (QPS) and the number of nodes? How does TiDB compare to MySQL?

Expand Down