Skip to content

executor: refactor hashjoin part6#39531

Merged
ti-chi-bot merged 11 commits into
pingcap:masterfrom
XuHuaiyu:split_hashjoin_part6
Dec 1, 2022
Merged

executor: refactor hashjoin part6#39531
ti-chi-bot merged 11 commits into
pingcap:masterfrom
XuHuaiyu:split_hashjoin_part6

Conversation

@XuHuaiyu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@XuHuaiyu XuHuaiyu commented Dec 1, 2022

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: ref #39061

Problem Summary:

What is changed and how it works?

Check List

Tests

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Side effects

  • Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
  • Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
  • Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features
  • Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ti-chi-bot commented Dec 1, 2022

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has been approved by:

  • guo-shaoge
  • wshwsh12

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 1, 2022
Comment thread executor/join.go Outdated
}
chk := e.ctx.GetSessionVars().GetNewChunkWithCapacity(e.buildWorker.buildSideExec.base().retFieldTypes, e.ctx.GetSessionVars().MaxChunkSize, e.ctx.GetSessionVars().MaxChunkSize, e.AllocPool)
err = Next(ctx, e.buildWorker.buildSideExec, chk)
chk := w.hashJoinCtx.sessCtx.GetSessionVars().GetNewChunkWithCapacity(w.buildSideExec.base().retFieldTypes, w.hashJoinCtx.sessCtx.GetSessionVars().MaxChunkSize, w.hashJoinCtx.sessCtx.GetSessionVars().MaxChunkSize, w.hashJoinCtx.sessCtx.GetSessionVars().ChunkPool.Alloc)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Make w.hashJoinCtx.sessCtx.GetSessionVars() as sessVars to avoid dup code?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@guo-shaoge guo-shaoge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rest LGTM

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. label Dec 1, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2. and removed status/LGT1 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 1. labels Dec 1, 2022
@XuHuaiyu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

XuHuaiyu commented Dec 1, 2022

/merge

@ti-chi-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This pull request has been accepted and is ready to merge.

DetailsCommit hash: dc4e7b9

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot added the status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. label Dec 1, 2022
@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot merged commit 7dedfab into pingcap:master Dec 1, 2022
@sre-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sre-bot commented Dec 1, 2022

TiDB MergeCI notify

🔴 Bad News! [3] CI still failing after this pr merged.
These failed integration tests don't seem to be introduced by the current PR.

CI Name Result Duration Compare with Parent commit
idc-jenkins-ci/integration-cdc-test 🔴 failed 1, success 39, total 40 24 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-common-test 🔴 failed 1, success 16, total 17 15 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/common-test 🔴 failed 1, success 10, total 11 11 min Existing failure
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-2 🟢 all 28 tests passed 7 min 0 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/tics-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 6 min 0 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/sqllogic-test-1 🟢 all 26 tests passed 5 min 22 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-ddl-test 🟢 all 6 tests passed 4 min 32 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/mybatis-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 3 min 52 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/integration-compatibility-test 🟢 all 1 tests passed 2 min 31 sec Existing passed
idc-jenkins-ci-tidb/plugin-test 🟢 build success, plugin test success 4min Existing passed

XuHuaiyu added a commit to XuHuaiyu/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2022
XuHuaiyu added a commit to XuHuaiyu/tidb that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. status/can-merge Indicates a PR has been approved by a committer. status/LGT2 Indicates that a PR has LGTM 2.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants