Skip to content

Conversation

@birdstorm
Copy link
Contributor

@birdstorm birdstorm commented Apr 7, 2021

Signed-off-by: birdstorm samuelwyf@hotmail.com

In correspondance with tikv/client-java#155

This PR tests the TiFlash logic with CI, and should NOT be merged.

Using DirectByteBuffer is better in most cases, but HeapByteBuffer is the prerequisite for Java 9+ support.

Signed-off-by: birdstorm <samuelwyf@hotmail.com>
@birdstorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

/run-all-tests test-flash=true

@birdstorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@plevart FYI, once the tests are passed, this PR will be closed and the corresponding PR in client-java will be merged.

@birdstorm birdstorm changed the title [DNM] Test Replace HeapByteBuffer with DirectByteBuffer [DNM] Test Replace DirectByteBuffer with HeapByteBuffer Apr 7, 2021
@birdstorm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tests passed, this PR is closed.

@birdstorm birdstorm closed this Apr 7, 2021
@birdstorm birdstorm deleted the replace-heap-byte-buffer-with-direct branch April 7, 2021 04:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant