Conversation
WalkthroughThe Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant Builder
participant TypeChecker
Caller->>Builder: Call OfType(builder, type, nullable)
Builder->>TypeChecker: Check type (string/int/bool/etc.)
alt Type is Nullable Generic
Builder->>Builder: Recursive call with nullable=true
else
TypeChecker-->>Builder: Return type info with nullable parameter
Builder->>Schema: Set schema.Nullable = nullable
end
Builder-->>Caller: Return updated builder
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/K8sOperator.NET.Generators/Builders/CustomResourceDefinitionBuilderExtensions.cs (2)
222-222: Complete the XML documentation for the 'nullable' parameter.The XML documentation for the
nullableparameter is incomplete. Please add a description that explains its purpose - it controls whether the schema property should allow null values.- /// <param name="nullable"></param> + /// <param name="nullable">A value indicating whether the schema property allows null values.</param>
225-271: Implementation of Int32, Int64, and Boolean datatypes looks good!The added support for Int32, Int64, and Boolean datatypes is implemented correctly. The approach of passing the nullability parameter through to the schema configuration is consistent with the existing String type handling.
I noticed that the implementation for Int32 and Int64 is identical - both set
x.Type = "integer". This is correct for OpenAPI/Kubernetes schema definitions, but you might consider adding a format constraint to differentiate them:builder.Add(x => { x.Type = "integer"; + x.Format = "int32"; x.Nullable = nullable; });For Int64:
builder.Add(x => { x.Type = "integer"; + x.Format = "int64"; x.Nullable = nullable; });This would more accurately represent the data types in the OpenAPI schema.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/K8sOperator.NET.Generators/Builders/CustomResourceDefinitionBuilderExtensions.cs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/K8sOperator.NET.Generators/Builders/CustomResourceDefinitionBuilderExtensions.cs (1)
268-271: Good handling of Nullable generic types.The implementation correctly handles nullable generic types by making a recursive call with
nullableset totrue. This ensures that nullable value types are properly represented in the schema.
Summary by CodeRabbit