Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2018. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@cdrage
Copy link
Member

@cdrage cdrage commented Sep 1, 2016

Don't know exactly why it's failing, but let's try this. Could be
related to "foobar" actually going to an internal server.

Don't know *exactly* why it's failing, but let's try this. Could be
related to "foobar" actually going to an internal server.
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 64.302% when pulling 86580db on cdrage:hopefully-fix-ci-errors into e37911e on projectatomic:master.

@cdrage cdrage mentioned this pull request Sep 1, 2016
@cdrage
Copy link
Member Author

cdrage commented Sep 1, 2016

#dotests

@cdrage
Copy link
Member Author

cdrage commented Sep 1, 2016

yay, looks like it fixed the tests, going to fix this "upstream" too in kubeshift.

@dustymabe
Copy link
Contributor

should we try to understand the situation here a bit more? would be nice to know the root cause.

@cdrage
Copy link
Member Author

cdrage commented Sep 1, 2016

No idea :( i can try pinging "foobar" from within the infrastructure and see what's up

@cdrage
Copy link
Member Author

cdrage commented Oct 6, 2016

I'm going to merge this for now so it prevents the daily email reminders that the build is failing on the CentOS CI

@cdrage cdrage merged commit 2b503eb into projectatomic:master Oct 6, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants