DECENTRALIZED_DATA_DELIVERY_MARKETS.md Open Problem Statement

[daviddias]

No description provided.

[jsoares]

Damn. This was on my to-do list for today and it would have been significantly easier in GDocs. I'll review...

[adlrocha]

Link to the following docs when they are merged:

• RIW2021_RFC_NoMarkets3DM #18
• RIW2021_RFC_Credit-based Retrieval Network #19
• RIW2021_RFC_QFIL Closed Retrieval Economy #20

[jsoares]

Part I of the review: up to Data Delivery Metering & Fair Exchange heading.

[jsoares]

Part II: Up to the Distribution Graph Forming heading.

[jsoares]

Penalized why/how?

[jsoares]

Part III: Up to 369

[jsoares]

Part IV: the end

[jsoares]

A few overall notes:

• The document is really comprehensive and detailed. Kudos on all the work that went into it.
• The document is also really long and took me a couple of hours to review. I'm afraid its length may put off readers. I'm not sure there's an action to be taken here but, in the future, I think it would be better to have a discrete and digestable document hierarchy. A good 5-page description of the overarching 3DM problem, followed by 5-page documents on each topic. Things could probably be a little more concise too; the detail is great but there is a point of diminishing returns.
• Alternatively, something like this could one day become a technical report. While the content is (more than) sufficient, this would require a lot of work on making the different sections more uniform and coherent, i.e. bring them all to the same level of depth. I don't think this is an objective, so, again, just take this as a future suggestion.

Anyhow, great work!