Add tests for hasattr/getattr usage on LookupDict#7401
Merged
nateprewitt merged 1 commit intomainfrom Apr 30, 2026
Merged
Conversation
sigmavirus24
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR codifies a few behaviors on LookupDict that weren't immediately clear when making changes for #7272. Because both dict keys and attributes are intended to operate interchangeably they typically behave identically.
The one exception to that is dict access through
["missing_key"]is treated asNonebut.missing_keyraises an AttributeError. That has implications onhasattr/getattrchecks for key presence.