fix(proofs): use /- block comment for RTAJittered.lean (matches RTA.lean style)

[avrabe]

Summary

The new Lean CI gate from #151 surfaced that `/-! ... -/` module-docstring before `import` is rejected by Lean 4.29.0-rc6 in this file's pattern, despite #159 having structurally moved imports above all comment blocks. The other working proof files (RTA.lean, RMBound.lean, EDF.lean) use `/- ... -/` regular block comments with closing `-/` on its own line — adopting that pattern resolves the rejection.

Format-only change. Comment body unchanged.

Test plan

• CI Lean job passes (after this lands; will also unblock feat(ci): Lean proof + Bazel + proptest CI gates (#135) #151)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[temper-pulseengine]

AI Code Review for PR #165

pulseengine/spar:fix/rtajittered-doc-style → pulseengine/spar:main

Summary

The PR changes the module-docstring comment block in RTAJittered.lean from a /! block comment to a regular block comment with closing -/. This change is intended to match the style used in other proof files, such as RTA.lean, RMBound.lean, and EDF.lean.

Potential Bugs or Issues

1. Compatibility: The PR does not specify whether this change will break compatibility with existing Lean 4.29.0-rc6 installations that rely on the previous module-docstring format.
2. Documentation Consistency: While the style is now consistent, it might be worth reviewing other files to ensure consistency across the project.

Security Concerns

There are no security concerns associated with this change as it only involves modifying comments and does not affect any logic or data processing in the file.

Suggestions for Improvement

1. Documentation Update: Ensure that all relevant documentation is updated to reflect the new comment style.
2. Testing: Conduct thorough testing to ensure that the PR does not introduce any unintended behavior or errors.
3. Review by Maintainers: Have a second reviewer review the change to catch any potential issues that might have been missed.

Overall Assessment

The change is a straightforward format-only update and should be relatively safe to merge. However, it's important to ensure compatibility with existing installations and review other files for consistency.

---

This review was generated by a local AI model. It is advisory only and may contain inaccuracies.

Reviewed at f952d4c

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!