Skip to content

Conversation

@jdegoes
Copy link
Contributor

@jdegoes jdegoes commented Oct 14, 2014

No description provided.

@paf31
Copy link
Contributor

paf31 commented Oct 14, 2014

Presumably this was just an oversight in the last PR? Just trying to understand the change..

@garyb
Copy link
Member

garyb commented Oct 14, 2014

Yep. Sorry, I should have noticed this before merging.

garyb added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2014
export all type class functions
@garyb garyb merged commit da48810 into purescript:master Oct 14, 2014
@jdegoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

jdegoes commented Oct 14, 2014

Yes, an oversight. If someone exports a type class but forgets the methods, I think that should be a compiler error (what does that mean? how is that usable?).

@garyb
Copy link
Member

garyb commented Oct 14, 2014

I'll add that to the check for purescript/purescript#562.

@jdegoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

jdegoes commented Oct 14, 2014

Awesome, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants