Skip to content

pin deps in CI#576

Merged
samuelcolvin merged 3 commits intomainfrom
ci-pin-deps
Nov 7, 2024
Merged

pin deps in CI#576
samuelcolvin merged 3 commits intomainfrom
ci-pin-deps

Conversation

@samuelcolvin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin commented Nov 7, 2024

Also use the new dev dependency groups in uv.

@alexmojaki @Kludex I think you’re both off today, and I need to get CI passing, so I’m going to merge this to pin dependencies and thereby get tests passing.

As I said on slack, I think pinning deps in CI is the best route anyway, but happy to discuss other routes when your back, you can consider this a temporary fix until we discuss next week.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Deploying logfire-docs with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 466a216
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://5352f567.logfire-docs.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://ci-pin-deps.logfire-docs.pages.dev

View logs

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (b71386e) to head (466a216).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #576   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          133       133           
  Lines        10256     10256           
  Branches      1399      1399           
=========================================
  Hits         10256     10256           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin merged commit 49d7633 into main Nov 7, 2024
@samuelcolvin samuelcolvin deleted the ci-pin-deps branch November 7, 2024 13:16
@Kludex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Kludex commented Nov 12, 2024

Since we are doing this, it would be good to have dependabot as well.

@Kludex
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Kludex commented Nov 12, 2024

The previous approach had the pro argument that we are faster to find out about incompatibilities caused by the optional dependencies. Which was the reason we made it that way.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants