Skip to content

Rename the project to pyproject-hooks and trim scope#151

Merged
takluyver merged 9 commits into
pypa:mainfrom
pradyunsg:rename-project
Oct 31, 2022
Merged

Rename the project to pyproject-hooks and trim scope#151
takluyver merged 9 commits into
pypa:mainfrom
pradyunsg:rename-project

Conversation

@pradyunsg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pradyunsg pradyunsg commented Oct 29, 2022

Toward #136
Closes #142, by removing the functionality it is requesting changes to.
Closes #91, by removing the functionality that it is tracking removal of.
Closes #49, by removing the functionality it is requesting changes to.

This is the first step, listed in #136 (comment).

This more clearly indicates the files that will eventually become
importable.
This functionality does not need to be maintained after this project is
renamed.
This template is not going to be necessary since this project will have
dropped these bits of functionality.
This more accurately reflects what this project is for.
This is a better name for the functionality provided by this class.
This makes the imports for this package cleaner.
This makes it clearer that this sub-package is intended to be a private
implementation detail.
This Python version is post-EOL.
@pradyunsg pradyunsg marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2022 04:11
@pradyunsg pradyunsg requested a review from takluyver October 30, 2022 04:11
@pradyunsg
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

There are a few more "obvious" improvements, like moving to [project] metadata, automated formatting, improving the documentation and adding type annotations.

I suggest that we make those improvements in follow ups.

quiet_subprocess_runner,
)

__version__ = '0.13.0'
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wouldn't this call for either a major version bump or versioning reset, since this practically makes this a new project from an end-user perspective?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think it's required, because with the name change there's no risk of unwittingly upgrading. But I'd be happy enough to call it 1.0 now that we're cutting off the deprecated bits of API.

Comment thread README.rst Outdated
@takluyver takluyver merged commit 1ea3e23 into pypa:main Oct 31, 2022
@takluyver
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks @pradyunsg !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

3 participants