create new dist option 'loadgroup'#637
Conversation
a072a72 to
17e0ec2
Compare
17e0ec2 to
7cd702f
Compare
|
Hi @dohyeop-sub, Sorry seems I have missed this PR completely! The feature is certainly interesting, and the PR seems actually near complete; you mention "If you are okay with adding features, related tests will be implemented", but seems like tests have been added already. Would you like to finish it up? |
I'll finish it. I will be using a different account, so I will post a new PR with that account. |
|
Hi @nicoddemus, I created a new PR. #733. |
|
Closing in favor of #733. |
Intro
There are currently several options for distributing tests,
but there is still no suitable option for the following cases:
Case 1
In this case, it is efficient to divide all tests into different sessions.
Case 2
In this case, it is efficient to run all tests in the same session.
Limit
If you use the loadscope option, all tests in Case 1 are performed in same session,
If the load option is used, all tests of Case 2 may be performed in different sessions.
Suggestion
Use the following xgroup mark and specify the name through the parameter.
Then, tests with the same name are executed in the same session.
Comment
This PR is to make sure that the addition of a feature does not conflict with other features,
If you are okay with adding features, related tests will be implemented.