[4.6] Backport #5389

[nicoddemus]

No description provided.

[asottile]

[nicoddemus]

Small nitpick: Would you mind we change the instructions on #5275 (comment) to use backport-XXXX instead of backport_XXXX? 😁

[asottile]

done! dashes are nicer, the shift key is sadness (shakes fist at black and double quotes)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5401 into 4.6-maintenance will increase coverage by 1.22%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           4.6-maintenance   #5401      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage            94.28%   95.5%   +1.22%     
==================================================
  Files                  115     115              
  Lines                26362   26562     +200     
  Branches              2603    2622      +19     
==================================================
+ Hits                 24855   25368     +513     
+ Misses                1178     887     -291     
+ Partials               329     307      -22

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/_pytest/config/__init__.py	94.43% <ø> (+0.63%)	⬆️
testing/test_config.py	99.83% <100%> (+0.34%)	⬆️
testing/test_unittest.py	71.82% <0%> (-27.28%)	⬇️
src/_pytest/unittest.py	84.61% <0%> (-9.6%)	⬇️
src/_pytest/main.py	96.06% <0%> (+0.21%)	⬆️
src/_pytest/fixtures.py	97.55% <0%> (+0.27%)	⬆️
testing/test_capture.py	99.25% <0%> (+0.29%)	⬆️
src/_pytest/python.py	93.33% <0%> (+0.36%)	⬆️
testing/test_pdb.py	98.44% <0%> (+0.38%)	⬆️
... and 24 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 937f945...0ae2771. Read the comment docs.