The license states HPND and I saw a PR from last year to get that text to match closer to what is listed on SPDX. However, I see that the Pillow license text actually matches what SPDX calls MIT-CMU (https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT-CMU.html) because of the additional text that is not included in HPND:
By obtaining, using, and/or copying this software and/or its associated
documentation, you agree that you have read, understood, and will comply
with the following terms and conditions:
For clarity, would it make sense to change Like PIL, Pillow is licensed under the open source HPND License to be MIT-CMU or maybe add the SPDX identifier to the license?
SPDX Identifier: MIT-CMU
The license states HPND and I saw a PR from last year to get that text to match closer to what is listed on SPDX. However, I see that the Pillow license text actually matches what SPDX calls MIT-CMU (https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT-CMU.html) because of the additional text that is not included in HPND:
For clarity, would it make sense to change
Like PIL, Pillow is licensed under the open source HPND Licenseto be MIT-CMU or maybe add the SPDX identifier to the license?SPDX Identifier: MIT-CMU