Request review on GitHub when the PR needs change review

[lysnikolaou]

Upon changing the status to awaiting change review, a review is also requested through the new GitHub API from the appropriate reviewers.

#165

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #168 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #168    +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage     100%   100%            
======================================
  Files          20     20            
  Lines        1557   1663   +106     
  Branches       87     89     +2     
======================================
+ Hits         1557   1663   +106

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
bedevere/stage.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
tests/test_stage.py	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
bedevere/bpo.py	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
tests/test_bpo.py	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6147b3f...fb7063f. Read the comment docs.

[brettcannon]

One very minor change and a clarifying question based on whether you have live-tested this or not.

[Mariatta]

Thanks @lysnikolaou for working on this. Would you be able to update the state machine at the top of stage.py to reflect the updated workflow?
I've just remembered it as I try to add "triagers" into the mix.

[lysnikolaou]

@Mariatta I guess I could do that, but I don't understand what you mean by "updated workflow"? If you mean the new GitHub Triagers, then I don't know what the new state should be.

[brettcannon]

@lysnikolaou I think she means what you're changing with this PR.

[lysnikolaou]

@brettcannon @Mariatta The thing is that the state machine should fundamentally remain the same. Maybe we could change the label on the edge Awaiting Changes -> Awaiting change review to include something like "New review gets requested", but I don't see what other changes need to be made.

[brettcannon]

@lysnikolaou yep, probably just the edge label to denote the side-effect that occurs.

[lysnikolaou]

@brettcannon I have updated the edge label, that needed tweaking, so the PR might be ready for another review.

[brettcannon]

LGTM! @Mariatta did you want to do one final review are you okay with merging this?

[Mariatta]

Sorry I don't have bandwidth to review this at the moment, don't want to block the progress.

[lysnikolaou]

@brettcannon Can this be merged as well?

[brettcannon]

Thanks for doing this, @lysnikolaou !