Skip to content

Conversation

@asottile
Copy link
Contributor

@asottile asottile commented Jan 28, 2019

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@eamanu eamanu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I re run the sample used on bpo https://bugs.python.org/issue35843 and have the expected behavior.

@asottile asottile force-pushed the bpo_35843_NamespacePath_Sized branch from 5550ff6 to 0de7e75 Compare February 17, 2019 16:10
@asottile
Copy link
Contributor Author

@serhiy-storchaka should be good to review again -- thanks for the tip 👍

@serhiy-storchaka
Copy link
Member

I can say nothing about whether this idea is good or bad. But technically this PR looks correct.

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

I'm blocking this to see if any other core devs have an opinion on this on the issue tracker, otherwise it LGTM!

@asottile
Copy link
Contributor Author

asottile commented Mar 7, 2019

@brettcannon given the +1 in the bpo issue I think this is good to go

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

@asottile that's the plan 😄 Just need to find the time to handle the merge (probably tomorrow/Friday).

@brettcannon
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @asottile !

@asottile asottile deleted the bpo_35843_NamespacePath_Sized branch March 8, 2019 19:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants