PEP 688: Making the buffer protocol accessible in Python #2549
Conversation
AA-Turner
left a comment
AA-Turner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are two uses of "I" which I've suggested turning into plural or neutral language as the rest of the document seems to use "we".
A couple of small suggestions elsewise.
A
|
Hey @JelleZijlstra , would you like me to proofread and suggest copyedits on this? |
|
@CAM-Gerlach yes please! Can't guarantee I'll agree with all your suggestions though :) |
CAM-Gerlach
left a comment
CAM-Gerlach
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Here you go! In a lot of places, I provided multiple different possible options for you to consider that resolved an issue, if you didn't like the first one (or I myself had no strong preference).
AlexWaygood
left a comment
AlexWaygood
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm excited to see this happen! A few thoughts from me below :)
AlexWaygood
left a comment
AlexWaygood
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A few more small points :)
|
Thanks everyone for the feedback! I just merged the PR so it shows up on the official site. If you have further textual suggestions, feel free to put a note here, open a PR, give me a handwritten note at PyCon, or let me know in whatever other way you can think of. |
|
Carrier pigeon. |
|
Interpretive dance. |
7 participants
No description provided.