fix several typos#6830
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 |
srittau
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2022
Collaborator
|
While I don't mind spelling fixes in comments, I don't think they should be a CI blocker. Especially since we can't do anything about misspelled function/field names. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Found by running
codespell stdlib/ stubs/ *.md, installed withpip install codespell==2.1.0.It would be possible to add codespell to our CI, but it doesn't seem like a good idea to me:
suite_maskassuite_mast, fixed in Improvesysstubs #6816. It was in code that isn't very stubtest-friendly. But codespell doesn't flag it either, becausemastis also a valid word.