Sourcery refactored master branch

[sourcery-ai]

Branch master refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the master branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/master
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

Help us improve this pull request!

[sourcery-ai]

Function main refactored with the following changes:

• Remove redundant pass statement (remove-redundant-pass)

[sourcery-ai]

Function Indicator.__optimize_signal refactored with the following changes:

• Remove redundant pass statement (remove-redundant-pass)

[sourcery-ai]

Function Indicator.indicator refactored with the following changes:

• Inline variable that is immediately returned (inline-immediately-returned-variable)

This removes the following comments ( why? ):

# compute signal with best parameter

[sourcery-ai]

Function Trade.buy refactored with the following changes:

• Use f-string instead of string concatenation [×12] (use-fstring-for-concatenation)
• Replace multiple comparisons of same variable with in operator (merge-comparisons)

[sourcery-ai]

Function Trade.sell refactored with the following changes:

• Use f-string instead of string concatenation [×11] (use-fstring-for-concatenation)
• Replace multiple comparisons of same variable with in operator (merge-comparisons)

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.90%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	11.51 🙂	10.69 🙂	-0.82 👍
Method Length	134.12 😞	134.00 😞	-0.12 👍
Working memory	2.15 ⭐	2.10 ⭐	-0.05 👍
Quality	42.90% 😞	43.80% 😞	0.90% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	432	505	73

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
thewife/__main__.py	43.98% 😞	44.93% 😞	0.95% 👍
thewife/indicator.py	40.11% 😞	40.54% 😞	0.43% 👍
thewife/trade.py	44.90% 😞	46.13% 😞	1.23% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation
thewife/indicator.py	Indicator.__optimize_signal	22 😞	460 ⛔		22.18% ⛔	Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods
thewife/trade.py	Trade.buy	9 🙂	401 ⛔		38.78% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods
thewife/__main__.py	main	11 🙂	329 ⛔	10 😞	41.75% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions
thewife/trade.py	Trade.sell	7 ⭐	353 ⛔		42.79% 😞	Try splitting into smaller methods
thewife/indicator.py	Indicator.__fetch_ohlcv	1 ⭐	200 😞		61.51% 🙂	Try splitting into smaller methods

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!