Arm backend: Add TOSA support for GroupNorm#10198
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/executorch/10198
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ✅ You can merge normally! (1 Unrelated Failure)As of commit bf10831 with merge base d4906e2 ( BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
|
Flaky behaviors on BI profile need to be investigated. |
|
Arm test fail Does it need a fix or rebase? |
3ef5cb2 to
f5d8911
Compare
|
Hi unfortunately it got a merge conflict and probably needs to be rebased after #10776 was merged. |
3f5ef3c to
d69c2ec
Compare
|
Label |
|
Failure in test-arm-backend: Do we need to mark |
|
This seem to again got "This branch has conflicts that must be resolved" :( |
- Decompose groupnorm into a sequence of supported operators - Have some numerical issues with BI profile - Fix docstring in decompose_layernorm_pass - Add "native_group_norm.default" to CUSTOM_EDGE_OPS Change-Id: I3f70388c12b8d9afd52876840b6c008a1b0bec4e Signed-off-by: Yufeng Shi <yufeng.shi@arm.com>
83fe44f to
2b18e66
Compare
|
Unrelated fail |
Change-Id: I3f70388c12b8d9afd52876840b6c008a1b0bec4e
cc @digantdesai @freddan80 @per @zingo @oscarandersson8218