Improve error handling for missing function matches #12
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
Apologies for the other inconsequential changes; I use an auto-formatter. |
Collaborator
|
Thanks! The fix shall be available on Pypi with version 0.3.3 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BinDiff can process BinExport files with errors and still generate a valid report. After loading such a report with
python-bindiff, iterating through matched functions causes aKeyErrorto be thrown wheniter_function_matchesattempts to access a missing address within the primary or secondaryFunctionBinExportfile. This change logs an error whenever a missing address is encountered, but allows valid function matches to be returned.