Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
# Interview Notes – P09

## Participant Info
| Field | Notes |
|-------|--------|
| Stakeholder type | Parent (Dad) of two children aged 6 and 9 |
| Ethnic Background | European (children raised in Singapore) |
| Age group | Mid 30s |
| Interview date | 6 January 2026 |
| Interviewer | Victoria |

---

## Key Discussion Points

### Current Behaviors
- Both children (6 and 9 years old) have grown up entirely in Singapore despite European heritage.
- Technology use is heavily restricted and purpose-driven: devices are permitted only for homework completion.
- Screen time during homework is actively supervised; one parent monitors what the child is browsing.
- Children do not own personal devices; they use parents' phones or iPads under supervision.
- Television and streaming content (e.g., Netflix) are rare; family prefers cinema outings for movie experiences.
- Eldest daughter (9) has been given a smartwatch ([Awei brand](https://aweistore.com/products/awei-h29-kids-smart-watch-sim-card-gps-tracker)) with limited functionality: can only call/message parents and allows location tracking.
- Wife is satisfied with the smartwatch purchase as it balances communication needs with restrictions.
- Non-screen activities are actively encouraged: drawing, creative play, and hands-on exploration.
- Father gifted daughter a standalone camera (not a phone) when she expressed interest in photography, deliberately avoiding multi-function devices.
- Purchased programmable robots for Christmas that require app-based programming; screen time is carefully monitored during these activities.

### Parenting Philosophy & Values
- Acknowledges being "more controlling than other parents" and is comfortable with this stance.
- Does not view technology as inherently necessary for childhood development.
- Believes strongly in teaching children "the ability to play" without screens.
- Values moments of sustained creative engagement (e.g., daughter spending entire day drawing).
- Observes other families' screen habits in public spaces (e.g., children on iPads in restaurants) and feels this does not align with personal values.
- Concerned about children's vulnerability to online risks and prioritizes protection.

### Boundary Enforcement & Peer Pressure
- Father has established firm, consistent boundaries; daughter has learned to anticipate his responses and rarely pushes back or throws tantrums.
- When daughter requested game installations on smartwatch, father refused without hesitation.
- Does not yield to peer pressure arguments (e.g., "other kids have phones").
- Firmly rejects the idea of an "appropriate age" to give children phones; instead, believes in continuous monitoring and evaluation with spouse to determine readiness on a case-by-case basis.
- Current assessment: "now is not a good time" for personal phone ownership.

### Pain Points / Frustrations
- Navigating requests for technology as children become aware of what peers have access to.
- Balancing educational technology needs (e.g., programmable robots requiring apps) with screen time restrictions.
- Finding non-screen alternatives that fulfill children's interests and developmental needs.

### Desired Features / Needs
- Devices with highly restricted functionality (e.g., smartwatch for communication and location only).
- Tools that support intentional, purposeful use rather than open-ended access.
- Non-screen alternatives for common childhood interests (e.g., standalone camera instead of smartphone).
- Educational technology that requires supervision but supports skill development (e.g., programmable toys).

### Safety & Trust Requirements
- Active parental supervision during all technology use.
- Communication-only devices with location tracking.
- Preference for single-purpose tools over multi-function devices.
- Ongoing spousal dialogue and shared decision-making about technology introduction.

### Opportunities / Ideas
- Support for parents managing peer comparison conversations with children.
- Curated lists of single-purpose educational devices (cameras, programmable toys, etc.).
- Tools that help parents evaluate readiness for device ownership based on demonstrated responsibility and maturity.
- Resources that validate intentional, low-tech parenting approaches in high-tech environments.

---

## Direct Quotes
> "I won't give in to peer pressure. I will say no."

> "There is no appropriate age to give [a phone]. It will be constantly monitoring the situation and evaluating with my wife if now is a good time."

> "I see so many kids in restaurants playing with iPads and it doesn't align with my values."

> "I believe in teaching kids the ability to play."

---

## Emotional Tone (optional)
| Feeling observed | Evidence |
|------------------|-----------|
| Confident / Resolute | Clear articulation of values; comfortable with being "more controlling"; no expressed doubt about approach |
| Protective / Vigilant | Strong emphasis on online vulnerability; active supervision; careful monitoring |

---

## Potential Themes Tags
`#restrictive_parenting` `#screen_time_limits` `#peer_pressure_resistance` `#non_digital_play` `#child_safety` `#supervised_use` `#single_purpose_devices` `#parental_control` `#values_based_parenting` `#intentional_technology_use`

---

## Follow-Ups
- Explore what specific online risks or scenarios he is most concerned about protecting his children from.
- Clarify how homework supervision is managed logistically (e.g., does one parent always sit beside them? how long does this typically take?).
- Understand how the family navigates situations where technology use is embedded in school requirements (e.g., learning platforms, collaborative tools).
- Document how children respond when they observe peers with greater device access (e.g., at school, playdates).
- Explore what "monitoring the situation" looks like in practice: what signals or milestones would indicate readiness for increased device access?
- Investigate whether there are any technology use contexts where he feels less certain or conflicted about his current approach.