German translation updates for Git 2.46 #9

ralfth · 2024-07-19T18:11:31Z

Hi team,

please review the German translation update for Git 2.46. There are 109 new or updated messages.
I'll be sending a PR to the l10n coordinator repo next weekend.

Thanks
Ralf

Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>

github-actions · 2024-07-19T18:23:00Z

Errors and warnings found by git-po-helper in workflow #27:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO [po/de.po@99e9899]	5734 translated messages. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO [po/de.po@638b411]	5624 translated messages, 75 fuzzy translations, 35 untranslated messages. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ERROR commit 638b411: subject ("Prepare de.po ...") does not have prefix "l10n:" 
INFO checking commits: 1 passed, 1 failed.        
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO downloading pot file from https://github.com/git-l10n/pot-changes/raw/pot/master/po/git.pot 

ERROR: fail to execute "git-po-helper check-commits"

po/de.po

ruester

Vielen Dank für deine Übersetzungen! 🥳 👍
Hab nur ein paar Anmerkungen und Rückfragen 😉

ralfth · 2024-07-24T10:43:11Z

Hervorragende Findings. Vielen Dank. Habe alles korrgiert.

ruester · 2024-07-25T19:18:34Z

Vielen Dank für deine Anpassungen 😃 👍

Reviewed-by: Matthias Rüster <matthias.ruester@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthias Rüster <matthias.ruester@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>

ralfth · 2024-07-26T15:45:46Z

Danke!

It was recently reported that concurrent reads and writes may cause the reftable backend to segfault. The root cause of this is that we do not properly keep track of reftable readers across reloads. Suppose that you have a reftable iterator and then decide to reload the stack while iterating through the iterator. When the stack has been rewritten since we have created the iterator, then we would end up discarding a subset of readers that may still be in use by the iterator. The consequence is that we now try to reference deallocated memory, which of course segfaults. One way to trigger this is in t5616, where some background maintenance jobs have been leaking from one test into another. This leads to stack traces like the following one: + git -c protocol.version=0 -C pc1 fetch --filter=blob:limit=29999 --refetch origin AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==657994==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x7fa0f0ec6089 (pc 0x55f23e52ddf9 bp 0x7ffe7bfa1700 sp 0x7ffe7bfa1700 T0) ==657994==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. #0 0x55f23e52ddf9 in get_var_int reftable/record.c:29 #1 0x55f23e53295e in reftable_decode_keylen reftable/record.c:170 #2 0x55f23e532cc0 in reftable_decode_key reftable/record.c:194 #3 0x55f23e54e72e in block_iter_next reftable/block.c:398 #4 0x55f23e5573dc in table_iter_next_in_block reftable/reader.c:240 #5 0x55f23e5573dc in table_iter_next reftable/reader.c:355 #6 0x55f23e5573dc in table_iter_next reftable/reader.c:339 #7 0x55f23e551283 in merged_iter_advance_subiter reftable/merged.c:69 #8 0x55f23e55169e in merged_iter_next_entry reftable/merged.c:123 #9 0x55f23e55169e in merged_iter_next_void reftable/merged.c:172 #10 0x55f23e537625 in reftable_iterator_next_ref reftable/generic.c:175 #11 0x55f23e2cf9c6 in reftable_ref_iterator_advance refs/reftable-backend.c:464 #12 0x55f23e2d996e in ref_iterator_advance refs/iterator.c:13 #13 0x55f23e2d996e in do_for_each_ref_iterator refs/iterator.c:452 git-l10n#14 0x55f23dca6767 in get_ref_map builtin/fetch.c:623 git-l10n#15 0x55f23dca6767 in do_fetch builtin/fetch.c:1659 git-l10n#16 0x55f23dca6767 in fetch_one builtin/fetch.c:2133 git-l10n#17 0x55f23dca6767 in cmd_fetch builtin/fetch.c:2432 git-l10n#18 0x55f23dba7764 in run_builtin git.c:484 git-l10n#19 0x55f23dba7764 in handle_builtin git.c:741 git-l10n#20 0x55f23dbab61e in run_argv git.c:805 git-l10n#21 0x55f23dbab61e in cmd_main git.c:1000 git-l10n#22 0x55f23dba4781 in main common-main.c:64 git-l10n#23 0x7fa0f063fc89 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58 git-l10n#24 0x7fa0f063fd44 in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360 git-l10n#25 0x55f23dba6ad0 in _start (git+0xadfad0) (BuildId: 803b2b7f59beb03d7849fb8294a8e2145dd4aa27) While it is somewhat awkward that the maintenance processes survive tests in the first place, it is totally expected that reftables should work alright with concurrent writers. Seemingly they don't. The only underlying resource that we need to care about in this context is the reftable reader, which is responsible for reading a single table from disk. These readers get discarded immediately (unless reused) when calling `reftable_stack_reload()`, which is wrong. We can only close them once we know that there are no iterators using them anymore. Prepare for a fix by converting the reftable readers to be refcounted. Reported-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

This one is a little bit more curious. In t6112, we have a test that exercises the `git rev-list --filter` option with invalid filters. We execute git-rev-list(1) via `test_must_fail`, which means that we check for leaks even though Git exits with an error code. This causes the following leak: Direct leak of 27 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x5555555e6946 in realloc.part.0 lsan_interceptors.cpp.o #1 0x5555558fb4b6 in xrealloc wrapper.c:137:8 #2 0x5555558b6e06 in strbuf_grow strbuf.c:112:2 #3 0x5555558b7550 in strbuf_add strbuf.c:311:2 #4 0x5555557c1a88 in strbuf_addstr strbuf.h:310:2 #5 0x5555557c1d4c in parse_list_objects_filter list-objects-filter-options.c:261:3 #6 0x555555885ead in handle_revision_pseudo_opt revision.c:2899:3 #7 0x555555884e20 in setup_revisions revision.c:3014:11 #8 0x5555556c4b42 in cmd_rev_list builtin/rev-list.c:588:9 #9 0x5555555ec5e3 in run_builtin git.c:483:11 #10 0x5555555eb1e4 in handle_builtin git.c:749:13 #11 0x5555555ec001 in run_argv git.c:819:4 #12 0x5555555eaf94 in cmd_main git.c:954:19 #13 0x5555556fd569 in main common-main.c:64:11 git-l10n#14 0x7ffff7ca714d in __libc_start_call_main (.../lib/libc.so.6+0x2a14d) git-l10n#15 0x7ffff7ca7208 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (.../libc.so.6+0x2a208) git-l10n#16 0x5555555ad064 in _start (git+0x59064) This leak is valid, as we call `die()` and do not clean up the memory at all. But what's curious is that this is the only leak reported, because we don't clean up any other allocated memory, either, and I have no idea why the leak sanitizer treats this buffer specially. In any case, we can work around the leak by shuffling things around a bit. Instead of calling `gently_parse_list_objects_filter()` and dying after we have modified the filter spec, we simply do so beforehand. Like this we don't allocate the buffer in the error case, which makes the reported leak go away. It's not pretty, but it manages to make t6112 leak free. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

In 1b9e9be (csum-file.c: use unsafe SHA-1 implementation when available, 2024-09-26) we have converted our `struct hashfile` to use the unsafe SHA1 backend, which results in a significant speedup. One needs to be careful with how to use that structure now though because callers need to consistently use either the safe or unsafe variants of SHA1, as otherwise one can easily trigger corruption. As it turns out, we have one inconsistent usage in our tree because we directly initialize `struct hashfile_checkpoint::ctx` with the safe variant of SHA1, but end up writing to that context with the unsafe ones. This went unnoticed so far because our CI systems do not exercise different hash functions for these two backends, and consequently safe and unsafe variants are equivalent. But when using SHA1DC as safe and OpenSSL as unsafe backend this leads to a crash an t1050: ++ git -c core.compression=0 add large1 AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==1367==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000040 (pc 0x7ffff7a01a99 bp 0x507000000db0 sp 0x7fffffff5690 T0) ==1367==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==1367==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x7ffff7a01a99 in EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex (/nix/store/h1ydpxkw9qhjdxjpic1pdc2nirggyy6f-openssl-3.3.2/lib/libcrypto.so.3+0x201a99) (BuildId: 41746a580d39075fc85e8c8065b6c07fb34e97d4) #1 0x555555ddde56 in openssl_SHA1_Clone ../sha1/openssl.h:40:2 #2 0x555555dce2fc in git_hash_sha1_clone_unsafe ../object-file.c:123:2 #3 0x555555c2d5f8 in hashfile_checkpoint ../csum-file.c:211:2 #4 0x555555b9905d in deflate_blob_to_pack ../bulk-checkin.c:286:4 #5 0x555555b98ae9 in index_blob_bulk_checkin ../bulk-checkin.c:362:15 #6 0x555555ddab62 in index_blob_stream ../object-file.c:2756:9 #7 0x555555dda420 in index_fd ../object-file.c:2778:9 #8 0x555555ddad76 in index_path ../object-file.c:2796:7 #9 0x555555e947f3 in add_to_index ../read-cache.c:771:7 #10 0x555555e954a4 in add_file_to_index ../read-cache.c:804:9 #11 0x5555558b5c39 in add_files ../builtin/add.c:355:7 #12 0x5555558b412e in cmd_add ../builtin/add.c:578:18 #13 0x555555b1f493 in run_builtin ../git.c:480:11 git-l10n#14 0x555555b1bfef in handle_builtin ../git.c:740:9 git-l10n#15 0x555555b1e6f4 in run_argv ../git.c:807:4 git-l10n#16 0x555555b1b87a in cmd_main ../git.c:947:19 git-l10n#17 0x5555561649e6 in main ../common-main.c:64:11 git-l10n#18 0x7ffff742a1fb in __libc_start_call_main (/nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a1fb) (BuildId: bf320110569c8ec2425e9a0c5e4eb7e97f1fb6e4) git-l10n#19 0x7ffff742a2b8 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (/nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a2b8) (BuildId: bf320110569c8ec2425e9a0c5e4eb7e97f1fb6e4) git-l10n#20 0x555555772c84 in _start (git+0x21ec84) ==1367==Register values: rax = 0x0000511000001080 rbx = 0x0000000000000000 rcx = 0x000000000000000c rdx = 0x0000000000000000 rdi = 0x0000000000000000 rsi = 0x0000507000000db0 rbp = 0x0000507000000db0 rsp = 0x00007fffffff5690 r8 = 0x0000000000000000 r9 = 0x0000000000000000 r10 = 0x0000000000000000 r11 = 0x00007ffff7a01a30 r12 = 0x0000000000000000 r13 = 0x00007fffffff6b38 r14 = 0x00007ffff7ffd000 r15 = 0x00005555563b9910 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/nix/store/h1ydpxkw9qhjdxjpic1pdc2nirggyy6f-openssl-3.3.2/lib/libcrypto.so.3+0x201a99) (BuildId: 41746a580d39075fc85e8c8065b6c07fb34e97d4) in EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex ==1367==ABORTING ./test-lib.sh: line 1023: 1367 Aborted git $config add large1 error: last command exited with $?=134 not ok 4 - add with -c core.compression=0 Fix the issue by using the unsafe variant instead. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Same as with the preceding commit, git-fast-import(1) is using the safe variant to initialize a hashfile checkpoint. This leads to a segfault when passing the checkpoint into the hashfile subsystem because it would use the unsafe variants instead: ++ git --git-dir=R/.git fast-import --big-file-threshold=1 AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL ================================================================= ==577126==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000040 (pc 0x7ffff7a01a99 bp 0x5070000009c0 sp 0x7fffffff5b30 T0) ==577126==The signal is caused by a READ memory access. ==577126==Hint: address points to the zero page. #0 0x7ffff7a01a99 in EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex (/nix/store/h1ydpxkw9qhjdxjpic1pdc2nirggyy6f-openssl-3.3.2/lib/libcrypto.so.3+0x201a99) (BuildId: 41746a580d39075fc85e8c8065b6c07fb34e97d4) #1 0x555555ddde56 in openssl_SHA1_Clone ../sha1/openssl.h:40:2 #2 0x555555dce2fc in git_hash_sha1_clone_unsafe ../object-file.c:123:2 #3 0x555555c2d5f8 in hashfile_checkpoint ../csum-file.c:211:2 #4 0x5555559647d1 in stream_blob ../builtin/fast-import.c:1110:2 #5 0x55555596247b in parse_and_store_blob ../builtin/fast-import.c:2031:3 #6 0x555555967f91 in file_change_m ../builtin/fast-import.c:2408:5 #7 0x55555595d8a2 in parse_new_commit ../builtin/fast-import.c:2768:4 #8 0x55555595bb7a in cmd_fast_import ../builtin/fast-import.c:3614:4 #9 0x555555b1f493 in run_builtin ../git.c:480:11 #10 0x555555b1bfef in handle_builtin ../git.c:740:9 #11 0x555555b1e6f4 in run_argv ../git.c:807:4 #12 0x555555b1b87a in cmd_main ../git.c:947:19 #13 0x5555561649e6 in main ../common-main.c:64:11 git-l10n#14 0x7ffff742a1fb in __libc_start_call_main (/nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a1fb) (BuildId: bf320110569c8ec2425e9a0c5e4eb7e97f1fb6e4) git-l10n#15 0x7ffff742a2b8 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (/nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a2b8) (BuildId: bf320110569c8ec2425e9a0c5e4eb7e97f1fb6e4) git-l10n#16 0x555555772c84 in _start (git+0x21ec84) ==577126==Register values: rax = 0x0000511000000cc0 rbx = 0x0000000000000000 rcx = 0x000000000000000c rdx = 0x0000000000000000 rdi = 0x0000000000000000 rsi = 0x00005070000009c0 rbp = 0x00005070000009c0 rsp = 0x00007fffffff5b30 r8 = 0x0000000000000000 r9 = 0x0000000000000000 r10 = 0x0000000000000000 r11 = 0x00007ffff7a01a30 r12 = 0x0000000000000000 r13 = 0x00007fffffff6b60 r14 = 0x00007ffff7ffd000 r15 = 0x00005555563b9910 AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info. SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV (/nix/store/h1ydpxkw9qhjdxjpic1pdc2nirggyy6f-openssl-3.3.2/lib/libcrypto.so.3+0x201a99) (BuildId: 41746a580d39075fc85e8c8065b6c07fb34e97d4) in EVP_MD_CTX_copy_ex ==577126==ABORTING ./test-lib.sh: line 1039: 577126 Aborted git --git-dir=R/.git fast-import --big-file-threshold=1 < input error: last command exited with $?=134 not ok 167 - R: blob bigger than threshold The segfault is only exposed in case the unsafe and safe backends are different from one another. Fix the issue by initializing the context with the unsafe SHA1 variant. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

When trying to create a Unix socket in a path that exceeds the maximum socket name length we try to first change the directory into the parent folder before creating the socket to reduce the length of the name. When this fails we error out of `unix_sockaddr_init()` with an error code, which indicates to the caller that the context has not been initialized. Consequently, they don't release that context. This leads to a memory leak: when we have already populated the context with the original directory that we need to chdir(3p) back into, but then the chdir(3p) into the socket's parent directory fails, then we won't release the original directory's path. The leak is exposed by t0301, but only when running tests in a directory hierarchy whose path is long enough to make the socket name length exceed the maximum socket name length: Direct leak of 129 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x5555555e85c6 in realloc.part.0 lsan_interceptors.cpp.o #1 0x55555590e3d6 in xrealloc ../wrapper.c:140:8 #2 0x5555558c8fc6 in strbuf_grow ../strbuf.c:114:2 #3 0x5555558cacab in strbuf_getcwd ../strbuf.c:605:3 #4 0x555555923ff6 in unix_sockaddr_init ../unix-socket.c:65:7 #5 0x555555923e42 in unix_stream_connect ../unix-socket.c:84:6 #6 0x55555562a984 in send_request ../builtin/credential-cache.c:46:11 #7 0x55555562a89e in do_cache ../builtin/credential-cache.c:108:6 #8 0x55555562a655 in cmd_credential_cache ../builtin/credential-cache.c:178:3 #9 0x555555700547 in run_builtin ../git.c:480:11 #10 0x5555556ff0e0 in handle_builtin ../git.c:740:9 #11 0x5555556ffee8 in run_argv ../git.c:807:4 #12 0x5555556fee6b in cmd_main ../git.c:947:19 #13 0x55555593f689 in main ../common-main.c:64:11 git-l10n#14 0x7ffff7a2a1fb in __libc_start_call_main (/nix/store/h7zcxabfxa7v5xdna45y2hplj31ncf8a-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a1fb) (BuildId: 0a855678aa0cb573cecbb2bcc73ab8239ec472d0) git-l10n#15 0x7ffff7a2a2b8 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (/nix/store/h7zcxabfxa7v5xdna45y2hplj31ncf8a-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a2b8) (BuildId: 0a855678aa0cb573cecbb2bcc73ab8239ec472d0) git-l10n#16 0x5555555ad1d4 in _start (git+0x591d4) DEDUP_TOKEN: ___interceptor_realloc.part.0--xrealloc--strbuf_grow--strbuf_getcwd--unix_sockaddr_init--unix_stream_connect--send_request--do_cache--cmd_credential_cache--run_builtin--handle_builtin--run_argv--cmd_main--main--__libc_start_call_main--__libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5--_start SUMMARY: LeakSanitizer: 129 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). Fix this leak. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

We don't free the result of `remote_default_branch()`, leading to a memory leak. This leak is exposed by t9211, but only when run with Meson with the `-Db_sanitize=leak` option: Direct leak of 5 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x5555555cfb93 in malloc (scalar+0x7bb93) #1 0x5555556b05c2 in do_xmalloc ../wrapper.c:55:8 #2 0x5555556b06c4 in do_xmallocz ../wrapper.c:89:8 #3 0x5555556b0656 in xmallocz ../wrapper.c:97:9 #4 0x5555556b0728 in xmemdupz ../wrapper.c:113:16 #5 0x5555556b07a7 in xstrndup ../wrapper.c:119:9 #6 0x5555555d3a4b in remote_default_branch ../scalar.c:338:14 #7 0x5555555d20e6 in cmd_clone ../scalar.c:493:28 #8 0x5555555d196b in cmd_main ../scalar.c:992:14 #9 0x5555557c4059 in main ../common-main.c:64:11 #10 0x7ffff7a2a1fb in __libc_start_call_main (/nix/store/h7zcxabfxa7v5xdna45y2hplj31ncf8a-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a1fb) (BuildId: 0a855678aa0cb573cecbb2bcc73ab8239ec472d0) #11 0x7ffff7a2a2b8 in __libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5 (/nix/store/h7zcxabfxa7v5xdna45y2hplj31ncf8a-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6+0x2a2b8) (BuildId: 0a855678aa0cb573cecbb2bcc73ab8239ec472d0) #12 0x555555592054 in _start (scalar+0x3e054) DEDUP_TOKEN: __interceptor_malloc--do_xmalloc--do_xmallocz--xmallocz--xmemdupz--xstrndup--remote_default_branch--cmd_clone--cmd_main--main--__libc_start_call_main--__libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.2.5--_start SUMMARY: LeakSanitizer: 5 byte(s) leaked in 1 allocation(s). As the `branch` variable may contain a string constant obtained from parsing command line arguments we cannot free the leaking variable directly. Instead, introduce a new `branch_to_free` variable that only ever gets assigned the allocated string and free that one to plug the leak. It is unclear why the leak isn't flagged when running the test via our Makefile. Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

Prepare de.po for new translations

638b411

Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>

ralfth requested review from PhillipSz and ruester July 19, 2024 18:11