Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
madhavanmalolan seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account. You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it. |
WalkthroughRestructures zkfetch documentation from a single quickstart model to modular pages. Simplifies index.mdx overview with condensed explanations, removes quickstart.mdx, introduces separate installation.mdx and usage.mdx files, and updates meta.json page references accordingly. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10–15 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
content/docs/zkfetch/index.mdx(1 hunks)content/docs/zkfetch/installation.mdx(1 hunks)content/docs/zkfetch/meta.json(1 hunks)content/docs/zkfetch/quickstart.mdx(0 hunks)content/docs/zkfetch/usage.mdx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- content/docs/zkfetch/quickstart.mdx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
content/docs/zkfetch/usage.mdx
[grammar] ~123-~123: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...rify the proofs and transform proof for onchain ### Verify the proofs Install @reclaimproto...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
[grammar] ~151-~151: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...m the js-sdk to transform the proof for onchain. ```js const onchainProof = Reclaim.tr...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
content/docs/zkfetch/index.mdx
[grammar] ~13-~13: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...username/passwords, PII etc. Using zero knowledge proofs, you can redact parts o...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
content/docs/zkfetch/meta.json (1)
3-3: Navigation structure updated correctly.The pages array now reflects the new documentation layout with
installationandusagepages replacing the previousquickstartentry. This ordering makes sense—setup before usage—and aligns with the new modular documentation structure.content/docs/zkfetch/installation.mdx (1)
6-42: Installation guide is well-structured and comprehensive.The documentation clearly covers prerequisites, API key setup, enabling zkFetch, installation steps, the zk file download requirement, and Next.js-specific configuration. The examples are concrete and actionable. Good separation of the platform-specific configuration section for Next.js users.
content/docs/zkfetch/usage.mdx (1)
1-155: Usage documentation is comprehensive and well-organized.The guide effectively covers initialization, request configuration (public vs. private options), response parsing, advanced matching/redaction options, and verification/on-chain transformation workflows. The troubleshooting section for chunked responses is particularly valuable. Code examples are clear and well-annotated. The progression from basic usage to advanced features is intuitive.
content/docs/zkfetch/index.mdx (1)
6-18: Excellent documentation restructuring: from workflow-centric to concept-centric.The new index effectively shifts from a procedural, multi-step workflow to a clear explanation of the core concept: zkFetch as a
(request, response, zkproof)tuple with cryptographic integrity and redaction capabilities. This concise overview sets up readers well for the newinstallation.mdxandusage.mdxpages. The explanation of why redaction is needed (API keys, credentials, PII) is practical and motivating.
| In some cases, it might not be possible to reveal the entire request or response. That is because the request or response might contain some sensitive information like api-keys, username/passwords, PII etc. | ||
|
|
||
| ### Flows | ||
| Using zero knowledge proofs, you can redact parts of the request and response without compromising the security of the cryptographic authenticity. So, the tuple that is really generated is |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct hyphenation: "zero knowledge proofs" → "zero-knowledge proofs".
Line 13 uses "zero knowledge proofs" (two words), but the standard English term in cryptography and blockchain contexts is "zero-knowledge proofs" (hyphenated).
Apply this diff:
- Using zero knowledge proofs, you can redact parts of the request and response without compromising the security of the cryptographic authenticity. So, the tuple that is really generated is
+ Using zero-knowledge proofs, you can redact parts of the request and response without compromising the security of the cryptographic authenticity. So, the tuple that is really generated is 📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Using zero knowledge proofs, you can redact parts of the request and response without compromising the security of the cryptographic authenticity. So, the tuple that is really generated is | |
| Using zero-knowledge proofs, you can redact parts of the request and response without compromising the security of the cryptographic authenticity. So, the tuple that is really generated is |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~13-~13: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...username/passwords, PII etc. Using zero knowledge proofs, you can redact parts o...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In content/docs/zkfetch/index.mdx around line 13, the phrase "zero knowledge
proofs" is missing the standard hyphenation; update it to "zero-knowledge
proofs" so the term follows conventional cryptography/blokchain usage by
replacing the two-word form with the hyphenated form at that location.
| --- | ||
| title: Installation | ||
| description: Flutter SDK for Reclaim Protocol | ||
| --- |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incorrect SDK description in front matter.
Line 3 states description: "Flutter SDK for Reclaim Protocol" but this is a JavaScript SDK installation guide. This appears to be a copy-paste error from another document.
Apply this diff to correct the description:
- description: Flutter SDK for Reclaim Protocol
+ description: JavaScript SDK for Reclaim Protocol📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| --- | |
| title: Installation | |
| description: Flutter SDK for Reclaim Protocol | |
| --- | |
| --- | |
| title: Installation | |
| description: JavaScript SDK for Reclaim Protocol | |
| --- |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In content/docs/zkfetch/installation.mdx around lines 1 to 4, the front-matter
description is incorrect ("Flutter SDK for Reclaim Protocol"); update the
description to reflect this is the JavaScript SDK installation guide by changing
the description line to "JavaScript SDK for Reclaim Protocol" in the front
matter.
| } | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| ## Verify the proofs and transform proof for onchain |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct hyphenation: "onchain" → "on-chain".
Line 123 uses "onchain" (one word), but the standard English form is "on-chain" (hyphenated), especially in blockchain contexts.
Apply this diff:
- ## Verify the proofs and transform proof for onchain
+ ## Verify the proofs and transform proof for on-chain📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ## Verify the proofs and transform proof for onchain | |
| ## Verify the proofs and transform proof for on-chain |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~123-~123: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...rify the proofs and transform proof for onchain ### Verify the proofs Install @reclaimproto...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In content/docs/zkfetch/usage.mdx around line 123, replace the nonstandard
single-word "onchain" with the hyphenated form "on-chain" to correct
hyphenation; update the heading "## Verify the proofs and transform proof for
onchain" to "## Verify the proofs and transform proof for on-chain" (preserve
capitalization and spacing).
|
|
||
| Transforms proof data into a format suitable for on-chain transactions, you need to use it before sending the proof to the blockchain. | ||
|
|
||
| Use Reclaim.transformForOnchain(proof) from the js-sdk to transform the proof for onchain. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct hyphenation: "onchain" → "on-chain".
Line 151 also uses "onchain" (one word). Use the hyphenated form "on-chain" for consistency and correctness.
Apply this diff:
- Use Reclaim.transformForOnchain(proof) from the js-sdk to transform the proof for onchain.
+ Use Reclaim.transformForOnchain(proof) from the js-sdk to transform the proof for on-chain.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Use Reclaim.transformForOnchain(proof) from the js-sdk to transform the proof for onchain. | |
| Use Reclaim.transformForOnchain(proof) from the js-sdk to transform the proof for on-chain. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~151-~151: Ensure spelling is correct
Context: ...m the js-sdk to transform the proof for onchain. ```js const onchainProof = Reclaim.tr...
(QB_NEW_EN_ORTHOGRAPHY_ERROR_IDS_1)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In content/docs/zkfetch/usage.mdx around line 151, the term "onchain" is used;
update the wording to the hyphenated form "on-chain" (e.g., change "transform
the proof for onchain" to "transform the proof for on-chain"), ensuring any
other "onchain" occurrence on that line is also replaced for consistency.
| @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
| title: Installation | |||
| description: Flutter SDK for Reclaim Protocol | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
description is incorrect
4 participants
Description
Testing (ignore for documentation update)
Type of change
Checklist:
Additional Notes:
Note
Revamps zkFetch docs: clearer intro, adds Installation and Usage (with Next.js config and advanced options), removes Quickstart, and updates navigation.
content/docs/zkfetch/index.mdx): Simplifies intro; explains(request, response, zkproof)tuple and redactions; notes usage mirrorsfetch.content/docs/zkfetch/installation.mdx)serverExternalPackages.content/docs/zkfetch/usage.mdx)ReclaimClient; constructpublicOptions/privateOptionswith example.responseMatches/responseRedactions; verify withReclaim.verifySignedProof; transform for on-chain.content/docs/zkfetch/meta.json): Updates pages to["installation", "usage", "cardano", "stellar"].quickstart.mdx.Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit fa9b2f3. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.