Support for running OFRAK on arm64 Linux

[alchzh]

Authored by @Jepson2k

• I have reviewed the OFRAK contributor guide and attest that this pull request is in accordance with it.

One sentence summary of this PR (This should go in the CHANGELOG!)
OFRAK Docker image builds on arm64 platforms (M1, etc.).

Link to Related Issue(s)
#549

Please describe the changes in your request.
This PR ensures that OFRAK Docker images build on arm64 platforms, such as the M1. All of the ofrak_patch_maker tests (except SPARC, which are skipped) pass on both x86_64, aarch64 platforms with this change.

ofrak-capstone: 1.1.0rc1

• Bump underlying capstone package to 5.0.3 to use pre-built aarch64 binaries

ofrak_core: 3.3.0rc3

• Bumped version of lief to 0.16.1, orjson to 3.10.12 to take advantage of pre-built aarch64 binaries
• Bumped version of angr to 9.2.133 for arm binaries

ofrak-patch-maker: 4.1.0rc0

• Dockerstub works for x86_64, aarch64 platforms for all toolchains except SPARC

Anyone you think should look at this, specifically?
@rbs-jacob

[alchzh]

test currently failing because the bumped angr version requires python >=3.10. I guess we can set a complex requirement for it

[rbs-jacob]

test currently failing because the bumped angr version requires python >=3.10. I guess we can set a complex requirement for it

Is the bumped angr version the minimum version that will work?

[alchzh]

Changed it so that toolchain.conf can be read from the /etc/ofrak/toolchain.conf, and the Dockerstub copies over the correct file based on the platform architecture

Left the current toolchain.conf in place to avoid breaking anyone's setup if they install a newer version. I want to update it to one without absolute paths in the future though so users can use executables that exist on their local PATH

[rbs-jacob]

More changes required before I'm comfortable merging this.

[rbs-jacob]

Two very small questions/comments. Then, this should be good to go!

[rbs-jacob]

@whyitfor Why did you end up breaking the toolchain config back out into two files in 31ae654 ?

[whyitfor]

@whyitfor Why did you end up breaking the toolchain config back out into two files in 31ae654 ?

@rbs-jacob, as we discussed offline, there are enough subtle differences that it's better to keep these lists discrete.