Use local timezone when query logs & usages for dedicated deployment #341
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PacificDou
changed the title
bigbitbus
approved these changes
Nov 28, 2024
Contributor
bigbitbus
left a comment
bigbitbus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just add the example for ISO
roboflow/deployment.py
Outdated
| exit(1) | ||
|
|
||
| if to_timestamp and not is_valid_ISO8601_timestamp(to_timestamp): | ||
| print("Please provide a valid to_timestamp in ISO8601 format") |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add one example so somone can make up the time format correctly
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Use local timezone when query logs & usages for dedicated deployment, default is UTC time.
List any dependencies that are required for this change.
Type of change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How has this change been tested, please provide a testcase or example of how you tested the change?
Tested locally.
Any specific deployment considerations
For example, documentation changes, usability, usage/costs, secrets, etc.
Docs