feat(attw): improve ignoreRules type to autocomplete known values#892
Merged
sxzz merged 1 commit intorolldown:mainfrom Apr 6, 2026
Merged
feat(attw): improve ignoreRules type to autocomplete known values#892sxzz merged 1 commit intorolldown:mainfrom
ignoreRules type to autocomplete known values#892sxzz merged 1 commit intorolldown:mainfrom
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for tsdown-main ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
tsdown
create-tsdown
@tsdown/css
@tsdown/exe
tsdown-migrate
commit: |
sxzz
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2026
ignoreRules type to autocomplete known values
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Linked Issues
Closes #891
Additional context
I left the type permissive so it allows any string as it did before, this merely improves the autocompletion. Typos will still pass as valid options, let me know if I should make the type strict by removing the
string & {}part.