fix(node-resolve): resolve hash in path#588
Conversation
|
This creates a bit of a special case, for instance it would not fix it for |
|
I agree this is definitely an improvement and could be released as a partial bug fix. But looking for a long term fix, why are we stripping BOTH I think it would still solve the original issue #486 in so far as it leaves a way to pass on information, just not via hashes. Thoughts @LarsDenBakker? |
|
I agree, ? Is the primary use case so we could leave out hashes. |
|
@chengcyber Would you be willing to modify this PR to remove the special handling for hashes altogether? Of course this would make this a breaking change, but I think this should be worth it in the long run. |
362a0c7 to
18acd47
Compare
|
@lukastaegert, I remove the special handling for hashes in the latest commit, please kindly take another look. |
* fix(node-resolve): resolve hash in path * refact(node-resolve)!: remove special handling for hashes See rollup/plugins#588 (comment)
* fix(node-resolve): resolve hash in path * refact(node-resolve)!: remove special handling for hashes See rollup/plugins#588 (comment)
Rollup Plugin Name: @rollup/plugin-node-resolve
This PR contains:
Are tests included?
Breaking Changes?
If yes, then include "BREAKING CHANGES:" in the first commit message body, followed by a description of what is breaking.
List any relevant issue numbers:
Description
This PR is fixing #587
treats as hash usage
treats
hashas part of package path