Clarify docstring#597
Merged
NotWoods merged 1 commit intorollup:masterfrom Oct 6, 2020
verygoodsoftwarenotvirus:documentation-fix
Merged
Clarify docstring#597NotWoods merged 1 commit intorollup:masterfrom verygoodsoftwarenotvirus:documentation-fix
NotWoods merged 1 commit intorollup:masterfrom
verygoodsoftwarenotvirus:documentation-fix
Conversation
NotWoods
approved these changes
Oct 6, 2020
Collaborator
|
@NotWoods please make sure you're using conventional commit for PR merges. just published a release and noticed that was missed in the change log. |
Member
|
Sorry, I've been trying to check them but this one slipped through |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rollup Plugin Name:
{typescript}This PR contains:
Are tests included?
Breaking Changes?
If yes, then include "BREAKING CHANGES:" in the first commit message body, followed by a description of what is breaking.
List any relevant issue numbers:
Description
I noticed while trying to debug an error that the docstring for the
excludefield was (erroneously) the same as theincludefield. That's all.