Skip to content

JointPositionController can now load the robot_description from root_node_handle ns#255

Closed
shisha101 wants to merge 1 commit intoros-controls:indigo-develfrom
shisha101:indigo-devel
Closed

JointPositionController can now load the robot_description from root_node_handle ns#255
shisha101 wants to merge 1 commit intoros-controls:indigo-develfrom
shisha101:indigo-devel

Conversation

@shisha101
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shisha101 shisha101 commented Mar 6, 2017

Please refer to Issue #256

…oot_node_handle name space and not always from the root name space
@graiola
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

graiola commented Mar 25, 2017

Hello,
I think this could be a possible solution to issue #244 but as it's implemented it would break the interface.
A fix would be to use an overloaded method or a method with default argument.

@bmagyar what do you think?

@bmagyar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bmagyar commented Mar 25, 2017

Good point. I think we have to also organise the effort of supporting non-global robot_description parameters in all of ros_controllers including a list of todos, extra tests to keep this feature in place and guidelines for people implementing new controllers to make sure they have this feature too.

@bmagyar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bmagyar commented Mar 25, 2017

@shisha101 please make sure that your changes are API and ABI compatible with the current version as we cannot break these in Indigo.

@shisha101
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Will do. I'll post back when it's ready.

@bmagyar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

bmagyar commented Apr 28, 2017

Hello,

I believe we should push this support through the same way (&same code) as it was done on #245. We ros/robot_model#193 will allow for that.

As such I'm closing this PR.

@bmagyar bmagyar closed this Apr 28, 2017
@shisha101
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Looks good, thanks for the heads up :)

@emekBaris
Copy link
Copy Markdown

emekBaris commented Oct 20, 2020

@bmagyar, this feature is missing in melodic-devel.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants