(RclJava) Fix NodeTest.testPubUInt32MultipleNodes() error #133
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sung-goo-kim
changed the title
jacobperron
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2020
Contributor
|
@sung-goo-kim Thanks for the fix! |
Member
|
@sung-goo-kim thanks! |
jacobperron
pushed a commit
to osrf/ros2_java
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2020
jacobperron
pushed a commit
to osrf/ros2_java
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2020
jacobperron
pushed a commit
to osrf/ros2_java
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2020
jacobperron
pushed a commit
to osrf/ros2_java
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2020
jacobperron
pushed a commit
to osrf/ros2_java
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2020
jacobperron
pushed a commit
to osrf/ros2_java
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2020
jacobperron
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 17, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently, the while loop exit even if only one of futureOne and futureTwo done.
While loop should exit when both futureOne and futureTwo are done.