Skip to content

Conversation

@flvrone
Copy link
Contributor

@flvrone flvrone commented Jan 19, 2021

Resolves #9

We don't really need that second optional argument, as its default value is just what we need, here:
https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.7.2/Module.html#method-i-private_method_defined-3F

We don't really need that second optional argument, 
as its default value is just what we need
https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.7.2/Module.html#method-i-private_method_defined-3F
@doudou
Copy link

doudou commented Jan 19, 2021

Thanks !

A suggestion: add 2.5 to the CI at the same time, to avoid a repeat.

@nobu nobu merged commit 956156b into ruby:master Jan 19, 2021
@benlangfeld
Copy link

@nobu Thanks for merging. Do you plan to release this soon?

@benlangfeld
Copy link

0.0.4 was released.

@eregon
Copy link
Member

eregon commented Jan 19, 2021

Related discussion: #8 (comment)

@doudou
Copy link

doudou commented Jan 19, 2021

That was ... incredibly fast.

Thanks a lot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

`private_method_defined?': wrong number of arguments (given 2, expected 1) in ruby2_keywords.rb

5 participants